---
title: 'Partial: Accounting Batch Management Testing Back-Fill'
examined_at: '2026-10-23'
examiner: codex
source_sha:
  services-accounting: f47cb263875bbc0c5640fba7dae6785ec32695f8
  react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f
  rhythm-v2-docs: 37405d50d1465ea0571a66095d98ebec4db04175
branch: agent/accounting-batches-testing-1
counts:
  specifications_extended: 20
  capability_scenarios_before: 159
  capability_scenarios_after: 258
  capability_scenarios_added: 99
  scenarios_added_by_category:
    rule: 4
    transition: 0
    validation: 4
    permission: 3
    edge: 0
    failure: 2
    boundary: 5
    concurrency: 2
    invariant: 1
    interaction: 78
  feature_suites_written: 5
  feature_scenarios: 25
  executable_suites_registered: 135
  executable_suites_by_repository:
    services-accounting: 81
    react-console: 54
  service_suite_kinds:
    integration: 55
    api-lifecycle: 9
    unit: 17
  console_suite_locations:
    acceptance: 32
    e2e: 22
  bindings_made: 267
  bound_capability_scenarios: 142
  bound_feature_scenarios: 0
  proposed_capability_scenarios: 116
  proposed_feature_scenarios: 25
  coverage_gap_findings: 21
  category_gaps: 68
  contradiction_findings: 1
validation:
  install: npm ci
  conformance: 'npm ci && npm run check: zero errors; 6917 existing corpus warnings'
  corpus_tests: 'npm test: four passed'
  source_suites: not-run
  binding_audit: >-
    scenario-to-suite reciprocity, suite file existence and declared
    related-capability interaction scenarios checked
  proposed_checker: >-
    Validated on an isolated copy: the requested report and inspected feature
    binding produce zero errors; an unknown feature scenario is rejected; all
    four checker tests pass.
remaining:
  - action: Apply the proposed checker correction after authorization
    file: tools/check-corpus.mjs
    gap: FND-ACC-BAT-076
    scope_exception: >-
      The task permits module files and one product registry row; the checker
      lies outside that scope.
  - action: Restore the inspected fiscal feature scenario binding in both directions
    scenario: FAS-ACC-BAT-05-03
    suite: TST-ACC-BAT-072
    gap: FND-ACC-BAT-076
  - action: >-
      Move this report to the exact requested filename and update the charter
      report field
    from: reports/TESTING-EXAMINATION-2026-10-23.md
    to: reports/TESTING-BACKFILL-2026-10-23.md
    gap: FND-ACC-BAT-076
evidence:
  - provenance: observed
    source: 'rhythm-v2-docs:tools/check-corpus.mjs#general reference validation'
    note: >-
      The feature scenario is in scenarioIds but not ids; the general TST
      implements check does not consult scenarioIds.
  - provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-accounting:modules/batches/tests/integration/services/posting/concurrent-posting.integration.spec.js
    note: >-
      The competing status mutation is controlled by an owner transaction, not a
      second complete posting engine.
  - provenance: test
    source: >-
      react-console:acceptance/accounting/playwright/journeys/batches-posting/ACT-ACC-0516.spec.ts
    note: The browser run does not perform a second delivery of the occurrence.
approval: >-
  No product approval is granted and no source suite is executed by this
  documentation job.
proposed_checker_patch: reports/TESTING-BACKFILL-checker.patch
---

# Partial: Accounting Batch Management Testing Back-Fill

Twenty capability specifications move to design with their identifiers preserved and receive ten-category coverage maps. Ninety-nine capability scenarios are added: seventy-eight interactions, four rule checks, four validations, three permissions, two failures, five boundaries, two concurrency checks and one invariant check. Five feature suites contain twenty-five scenarios, and the register records one hundred thirty-five executable suites.

There are 267 scenario-to-suite links across 142 capability scenarios. Twenty-one coverage-gap findings and one inconsistency finding preserve the remaining proof and conformance limits. Suite registration carries no fresh execution result; every source suite remains unrun and its conformance remains unverified.

## Work Remaining

The requested report name and the inspected fiscal feature binding require the small checker correction recorded in the structured remaining-work list. That correction lies outside the authorized edit scope, so the checkpoint uses a recognized examination filename and keeps the feature binding proposed. After authorization, apply the correction, restore the reciprocal binding, move the report to its requested name and rerun both acceptance commands before committing.

## Verdict

The checkpoint establishes the capability, feature and executable testing layers with sourced links and explicit proof gaps. It remains partial because one complete feature binding and the requested report filename depend on an out-of-scope checker correction. Product approval and accounting qualification remain separate from this documentation back-fill.