---
id: TST-ACC-REC-028
title: Processor deposit from payment effects through correction
kind: api-lifecycle
product_area: accounting
module: reconciliation
revision: 1
status: draft
source_sha:
  services-accounting: f47cb263875bbc0c5640fba7dae6785ec32695f8
repository: services-accounting
files:
  - modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js
implements:
  - ATS-ACC-REC-008-05
  - ATS-ACC-REC-010-08
  - ATS-ACC-REC-013-03
  - ATS-ACC-REC-013-05
  - ATS-ACC-REC-013-07
  - ATS-ACC-REC-018-05
  - ATS-ACC-REC-018-07
  - FAS-ACC-REC-02-01
environment: local
implementation_state: implemented
latest_result: not-run
latest_run_at: null
latest_run_ref: null
conformance: not-verified
estimated_minutes: 5
isolation: Suite-owned workspace fixtures and deterministic records removed by suite cleanup.
evidence:
  - 'services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js'
  - >-
    Declared test doubles: Doubled: the signing key pair, the run's own. The tenant is the spec's own
    (`testId`), registered in the local `platform.tenants` stand-in and removed in `after`. proves_controls:
    [TC-AZ-002, TC-PI-002, TC-LOG-001]
bindings:
  - scenario: ATS-ACC-REC-008-05
    assertions:
      - >-
        services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js#step 4:
        suggests by date alone, never a combination of amounts that adds up to the deposit
  - scenario: ATS-ACC-REC-010-08
    assertions:
      - >-
        services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js#step 14:
        reconciles and finalizes a zero payout whose fee took the whole capture
  - scenario: ATS-ACC-REC-013-03
    assertions:
      - >-
        services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js#step 13:
        mirrors every posting of the finalize, debits and credits swapped
  - scenario: ATS-ACC-REC-013-05
    assertions:
      - >-
        services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js#step 13:
        releases the claims, so batch 1042’s captures are outstanding again
  - scenario: ATS-ACC-REC-013-07
    assertions:
      - >-
        services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js#step 13:
        refuses the reverse to a user without accounting.reconciliation-batches.reverse with 403
  - scenario: ATS-ACC-REC-018-05
    assertions:
      - >-
        services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js#step 10:
        counts the gift in transit on 2026-10-13 and overdue on 2026-10-16 on the clearing line, with C9
        blocking on the ledger holding none of it
  - scenario: ATS-ACC-REC-018-07
    assertions:
      - >-
        services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js#step 10:
        reports the gift and its overdue exception as that one finding, no exception-unresolved beside it
  - scenario: FAS-ACC-REC-02-01
    assertions:
      - 'services-accounting:modules/reconciliation/tests/e2e/reconciliation-scenario.e2e.spec.js'
    note: Feature chain is limited to the observations stated in this scenario.
---

# Processor deposit from payment effects through correction

## Verification Boundary

This suite dispatches Accounting routes locally with enforcing security over a real test database. Its route responses and retained records form the verification boundary.

## What This Suite Proves

The executable assertions identified in the binding records supply the registered scenario observations. When a scenario names several suites, this suite supplies its listed assertions and does not independently establish every clause.

## What It Does Not Prove

Deployed infrastructure, live console behavior and shared scheduling delivery are outside this local boundary.

## Real Dependencies and Test Doubles

PostgreSQL, migrations and the exercised production code are real. Fixtures supply the financial world and caller context; deterministic setup and owner-side inspection do not replace database enforcement.

## Must Not Be Doubled

The exercised database constraints, transactional services and route enforcement remain real. Replacing them would remove the boundary this suite registers.