--- id: ATS-COM-ORD-018 scope: CAP-COM-ORD-018 product_area: commerce module: orders revision: 2 status: proposed approved_by: null approved_at: null source_sha: services-commerce: c8b66a98e2490617aec38ba5c8165dd9bd0a8f9b macroservice-libraries: 54536a441935c6e09fdb7f96f0bec71c52ba4e03 react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f scenarios: - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-01 title: Receipt replay retains the first delivery record level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-01 preconditions: A keyed receipt is accepted against an issued purchase order. steps: - do: Submit the same receipt key again. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#answers the retried receipt as found under its key, writing nothing twice expected: The response identifies the existing receipt without duplicate stock or cost writes. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#answers the retried receipt as found under its key, writing nothing twice - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#answers the retried first receipt as the same receipt, lists the receipts by order and reads one with its lines - TST-COM-ORD-160 - TST-COM-ORD-155 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#answers the retried receipt as found under its key, writing nothing twice category: invariant expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#answers the retried receipt as found under its key, writing nothing twice - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-02 title: Receipt validation prevents excess or unexplained cost level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-02 preconditions: The open line has forty units left and a separate order is already received. steps: - do: >- Attempt excess quantity, another receipt on the completed order and changed cost without and with a reason. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt beyond what the line has open (over_receipt) and a receipt against a received order, writing nothing expected: Invalid receipt cases write nothing and only the explained cost variance proceeds. negative: true data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt beyond what the line has open (over_receipt) and a receipt against a received order, writing nothing - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt line whose cost differs from the order line’s without a reason, and takes one with a reason - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt beyond what the line has open (over_receipt) and a receipt against a received order, writing nothing category: validation expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt beyond what the line has open (over_receipt) and a receipt against a received order, writing nothing - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-03 title: Receiving commits quantity and capitalization together level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-03 preconditions: Two backorders wait for a sixty-unit delivery at ten dollars per unit. steps: - do: 'Record the delivery and inspect stock, layers, posting facts and claims.' provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#writes, in the receipt’s transaction, the receipt movement naming the line, the layer of 60 @ 1000 and the capitalize_receipt fact of 60000 expected: >- The fixture creates sixty units at cost, a six-hundred-dollar capitalization fact and ordered backorder fill with fifty-eight units available. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#writes, in the receipt’s transaction, the receipt movement naming the line, the layer of 60 @ 1000 and the capitalize_receipt fact of 60000 - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#writes, in the receipt’s transaction, the receipt movement naming the line, the layer of 60 @ 1000 and the capitalize_receipt fact of 60000 category: invariant expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#writes, in the receipt’s transaction, the receipt movement naming the line, the layer of 60 @ 1000 and the capitalize_receipt fact of 60000 - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-04 title: Landed-cost allocation retains the minor-unit total level: unit proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-04 preconditions: Receipt lines have different quantities and values. steps: - do: Allocate freight by each supported basis and derive layer unit cost. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#shares by quantity to the minor unit, the last line taking the rounding remainder expected: Shares preserve the total through the final-line remainder and unit cost includes the allocated portion. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#shares by quantity to the minor unit, the last line taking the rounding remainder - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#shares by value: a line worth three times another takes three times the landed cost - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#is the line’s cost plus its landed share per unit, to the nearest minor unit - TST-COM-ORD-161 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#shares by quantity to the minor unit, the last line taking the rounding remainder category: boundary expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#shares by quantity to the minor unit, the last line taking the rounding remainder - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-05 title: Method switching leaves earlier cost history intact level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-05 preconditions: Two layers have different dates and costs with no initial business-unit setting. steps: - do: 'Relieve under default FIFO, switch to LIFO and relieve again.' provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves under FIFO while the business unit has no setting: 4 @ 1000 from the older layer, recorded fifo expected: 'FIFO uses earlier units, LIFO uses later units and the earlier relief records remain unchanged.' negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves under FIFO while the business unit has no setting: 4 @ 1000 from the older layer, recorded fifo - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves a LIFO business unit’s 12 over two layers newer first: 10 @ 1200 from the newer, then 2 @ 1000 from the older, recorded lifo - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#rewrites nothing made before the switch: the FIFO relief rows read back unchanged, the receipt layers still record fifo - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves under FIFO while the business unit has no setting: 4 @ 1000 from the older layer, recorded fifo category: rule expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves under FIFO while the business unit has no setting: 4 @ 1000 from the older layer, recorded fifo - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-06 title: Costing settings require current version and allowed method level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-06 preconditions: The business unit has no configured setting. steps: - do: 'Read defaults, write LIFO, try stale replacement and invalid method or unit inputs.' provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#reads a business unit with no settings at the defaults: FIFO at version 0, not configured expected: 'Defaults expose version zero, the valid write succeeds and stale or malformed requests fail.' negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#reads a business unit with no settings at the defaults: FIFO at version 0, not configured - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#writes LIFO at version 0, replaces it with the record read sent back, and refuses the stale version 409 - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#refuses a method that is neither FIFO nor LIFO 400, and a body naming another business unit 400 - TST-COM-ORD-155 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#reads a business unit with no settings at the defaults: FIFO at version 0, not configured category: validation expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#reads a business unit with no settings at the defaults: FIFO at version 0, not configured - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-07 title: Uncovered relief is explicitly flagged level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-07 preconditions: The shipped quantity exceeds available cost-layer coverage. steps: - do: Relieve the shipped units. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves units no layer covers at cost zero under no layer and raises uncosted_relief, so the books say so expected: Uncovered units carry zero cost with an uncosted_relief exception. negative: true data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves units no layer covers at cost zero under no layer and raises uncosted_relief, so the books say so - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves units no layer covers at cost zero under no layer and raises uncosted_relief, so the books say so category: failure expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves units no layer covers at cost zero under no layer and raises uncosted_relief, so the books say so - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-08 title: Return cost reverses the shipment basis level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-08 preconditions: Shipment relief used identified layers at retained costs. steps: - do: Restore five returned units. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost expected: Restore rows identify their reliefs and original-cost layers with a matching cost-restoration fact. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost category: interaction expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-09 title: Cost corrections preserve the consumed record level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-09 preconditions: A costed layer has remaining units and needs a lower unit cost. steps: - do: Correct its remaining cost basis. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#moves the unconsumed remainder to a layer at the corrected cost, leaves the original consumed, and writes the cost_adjustment of the difference expected: >- The remainder moves into a successor layer, the original is consumed and the value difference becomes a cost-adjustment fact. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#moves the unconsumed remainder to a layer at the corrected cost, leaves the original consumed, and writes the cost_adjustment of the difference - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#corrects the second layer’s cost to 1100: the remainder on a correction layer, the original consumed, a cost_adjustment of 10 × 150, the valuation reconciled - TST-COM-ORD-160 - TST-COM-ORD-155 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#moves the unconsumed remainder to a layer at the corrected cost, leaves the original consumed, and writes the cost_adjustment of the difference category: transition expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#moves the unconsumed remainder to a layer at the corrected cost, leaves the original consumed, and writes the cost_adjustment of the difference - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-10 title: Valuation reconciles quantities beside their assigned cost level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-10 preconditions: The fixture layers contain three zero-cost units and two ten-unit priced layers. steps: - do: Read valuation and business-unit summaries. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#values the shirt L item at Σ the layers (3 at zero from the movement route, 10 × 1000, 10 × 1250 = 22500), reconciled with 23 on hand expected: The item reports twenty-three units and 225 dollars with reconciliation and its costing setting. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#values the shirt L item at Σ the layers (3 at zero from the movement route, 10 × 1000, 10 × 1250 = 22500), reconciled with 23 on hand - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#shows the products’ business unit and its method beside the valuation’s totals: faa, FIFO, not configured - TST-COM-ORD-155 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#values the shirt L item at Σ the layers (3 at zero from the movement route, 10 × 1000, 10 × 1250 = 22500), reconciled with 23 on hand category: rule expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#values the shirt L item at Σ the layers (3 at zero from the movement route, 10 × 1000, 10 × 1250 = 22500), reconciled with 23 on hand - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-11 title: Posting acknowledgement is stable by reference level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-11 preconditions: Two receipt facts remain unposted. steps: - do: 'List them, acknowledge a reference, replay it and attempt another reference.' provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#lists the unposted facts by date, stamps them posted once under Accounting’s reference, and refuses another reference on a posted fact expected: >- The same reference replays without changing history, another reference fails and acknowledged facts leave intake. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#lists the unposted facts by date, stamps them posted once under Accounting’s reference, and refuses another reference on a posted fact - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#lists the facts unposted (the two receipts’), stamps them posted under Accounting’s reference, and lists none unposted after - TST-COM-ORD-160 - TST-COM-ORD-155 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#lists the unposted facts by date, stamps them posted once under Accounting’s reference, and refuses another reference on a posted fact category: invariant expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#lists the unposted facts by date, stamps them posted once under Accounting’s reference, and refuses another reference on a posted fact - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-12 title: Posting kinds expose their debit and credit purposes level: unit proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-12 preconditions: 'Inputs cover receipt, shipment, restore, loss, scrap and gain.' steps: - do: Resolve account purposes for each fact kind. provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#debits inventory and credits GRNI for a receipt, debits COGS and credits inventory for a handoff, the reverse for a restore expected: 'The returned inventory, clearing, cost-of-goods and adjustment directions match the supplied fact kind.' negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#debits inventory and credits GRNI for a receipt, debits COGS and credits inventory for a handoff, the reverse for a restore - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#debits the adjustment account for a loss or a write-off and credits it for a gain - TST-COM-ORD-161 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#debits inventory and credits GRNI for a receipt, debits COGS and credits inventory for a handoff, the reverse for a restore category: rule expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#debits inventory and credits GRNI for a receipt, debits COGS and credits inventory for a handoff, the reverse for a restore - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-13 title: 'Supply flow connects waiting orders, valuation and posting' level: api proves: - AS-JNY-COM-ORD-006-01 - AS-JNY-COM-ORD-006-02 - AS-JNY-COM-ORD-006-03 preconditions: A vendor supplies stock with existing backorders. steps: - do: 'Issue the commitment, receive deliveries and inspect valuation and posting acknowledgement.' provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after expected: 'The demonstrated components fill waiting claims, reconcile layer value and acknowledge each fact once.' negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#values the item after at 30 × 1200 = 36000, reconciled with the ledger’s on-hand of 30 - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#lists the unposted facts by date, stamps them posted once under Accounting’s reference, and refuses another reference on a posted fact - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after category: interaction expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-14 title: Transfers preserve value without inventing uncovered cost level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-14 preconditions: >- A transfer contains covered stock whose total cost has a rounding remainder and additional stock without an acquisition layer. steps: - do: 'Transfer the units and inspect source relief, destination layers and posting facts.' provenance: proposed source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/cost/transfer-cost.ts:costTransfer' expected: >- Covered value is preserved exactly across weighted destination layers, uncovered units create no destination cost layer, and the transfer creates no financial posting fact. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/cost/transfer-cost.ts:costTransfer' category: boundary expected_provenance: proposed expected_source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/cost/transfer-cost.ts:costTransfer' - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-15 title: Count and staff movements retain the proper cost facts level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-15 preconditions: Inventory has receipt cost history and count or staff changes. steps: - do: 'Record gains, losses and scrap in the fixture flows.' provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves a scrap FIFO with a write_off fact, and a negative adjustment with an adjustment_loss fact expected: >- Gains create receipt-based cost, losses consume layers and each movement records its demonstrated adjustment or write-off purpose. negative: false data_needs: Use the controlled records and transports established by the cited tests. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves a scrap FIFO with a write_off fact, and a negative adjustment with an adjustment_loss fact - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#values a count gain at the last receipt cost (adjustment_gain) and relieves a count loss (adjustment_loss), each fact naming the count line - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves a scrap FIFO with a write_off fact, and a negative adjustment with an adjustment_loss fact category: rule expected_provenance: test expected_source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves a scrap FIFO with a write_off fact, and a negative adjustment with an adjustment_loss fact - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-16 title: Valuation reports missing cost evidence without repairing stock category: failure level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-13 preconditions: The fixture has uncovered stock and a shipment movement without relief beside reconciled items. steps: - do: Run valuation findings and inspect those records. provenance: test source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/valuation/inventory-valuation.ts:raiseCostFindings' expected: The discrepancies raise valuation and missing-relief exceptions; reconciled items raise neither. negative: true data_needs: Use an isolated workspace with the records and responses named in the preconditions. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#raises valuation_mismatch on stock no layer costs, relief_missing on a shipment movement no relief followed, and nothing on the reconciled items - TST-COM-ORD-160 provenance: test source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/valuation/inventory-valuation.ts:raiseCostFindings' coverage_limit: >- The executable example covers shipment relief; the transfer missing-relief branch remains a coverage gap. expected_provenance: test expected_source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/valuation/inventory-valuation.ts:raiseCostFindings' - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-17 title: Returned goods restore their original acquisition cost category: interaction level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-016-06 - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-08 preconditions: A shipped line has identified layer relief and a receipt-based return authorization. steps: - do: Receive part of the goods and then the remainder; inspect cost restoration and settlement. provenance: proposed source: - >- services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js#takes the warehouse’s receipt: the goods back on the line, the memo and the refund run, the document completed and the RMA closed - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost expected: >- Partial receiving leaves the authorization open and cost restoration reverses the original relief as the completed return settles. negative: false data_needs: Use an isolated workspace with the records and responses named in the preconditions. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: - >- services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js#takes the warehouse’s receipt: the goods back on the line, the memo and the refund run, the document completed and the RMA closed - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost exercises: - CAP-COM-ORD-018 - CAP-COM-ORD-016 related_capabilities: - CAP-COM-ORD-016 expected_provenance: proposed expected_source: - >- services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js#takes the warehouse’s receipt: the goods back on the line, the memo and the refund run, the document completed and the RMA closed - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost - id: ATS-COM-ORD-018-18 title: Partial receipts retain the vendor commitment and acquisition trail category: interaction level: api proves: - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-01 - BR-CAP-COM-ORD-017-01 preconditions: An issued vendor purchase covers one hundred units with waiting backorders. steps: - do: 'Receive sixty and then forty; inspect purchase progress, stock, cost and posting intake.' provenance: proposed source: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt line whose cost differs from the order line’s without a reason, and takes one with a reason - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#lists the facts unposted (the two receipts’), stamps them posted under Accounting’s reference, and lists none unposted after expected: 'The first receipt is partial and the second completes the order, with one acquisition trail per receipt.' negative: false data_needs: Use an isolated workspace with the records and responses named in the preconditions. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt line whose cost differs from the order line’s without a reason, and takes one with a reason - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#lists the facts unposted (the two receipts’), stamps them posted under Accounting’s reference, and lists none unposted after exercises: - CAP-COM-ORD-018 - CAP-COM-ORD-017 workflows: - WF-COM-ORD-015 expected_provenance: proposed expected_source: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt line whose cost differs from the order line’s without a reason, and takes one with a reason - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#lists the facts unposted (the two receipts’), stamps them posted under Accounting’s reference, and lists none unposted after evidence: - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#answers the retried first receipt as the same receipt, lists the receipts by order and reads one with its lines - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#corrects the second layer’s cost to 1100: the remainder on a correction layer, the original consumed, a cost_adjustment of 10 × 150, the valuation reconciled - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#lists the facts unposted (the two receipts’), stamps them posted under Accounting’s reference, and lists none unposted after - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#reads a business unit with no settings at the defaults: FIFO at version 0, not configured - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#refuses a method that is neither FIFO nor LIFO 400, and a body naming another business unit 400 - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#shows the products’ business unit and its method beside the valuation’s totals: faa, FIFO, not configured - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#values the shirt L item at Σ the layers (3 at zero from the movement route, 10 × 1000, 10 × 1250 = 22500), reconciled with 23 on hand - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#writes LIFO at version 0, replaces it with the record read sent back, and refuses the stale version 409 - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#answers the retried receipt as found under its key, writing nothing twice - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#lists the unposted facts by date, stamps them posted once under Accounting’s reference, and refuses another reference on a posted fact - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#moves the unconsumed remainder to a layer at the corrected cost, leaves the original consumed, and writes the cost_adjustment of the difference - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt beyond what the line has open (over_receipt) and a receipt against a received order, writing nothing - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt line whose cost differs from the order line’s without a reason, and takes one with a reason - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves a LIFO business unit’s 12 over two layers newer first: 10 @ 1200 from the newer, then 2 @ 1000 from the older, recorded lifo - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves a scrap FIFO with a write_off fact, and a negative adjustment with an adjustment_loss fact - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves under FIFO while the business unit has no setting: 4 @ 1000 from the older layer, recorded fifo - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves units no layer covers at cost zero under no layer and raises uncosted_relief, so the books say so - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores 5 returned units at the relieved cost and place: a restore row naming the relief it reverses, a layer at that cost dated with the original layer, a restore_cogs fact of 5 × that cost - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#rewrites nothing made before the switch: the FIFO relief rows read back unchanged, the receipt layers still record fifo - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#values a count gain at the last receipt cost (adjustment_gain) and relieves a count loss (adjustment_loss), each fact naming the count line - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#values the item after at 30 × 1200 = 36000, reconciled with the ledger’s on-hand of 30 - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#writes, in the receipt’s transaction, the receipt movement naming the line, the layer of 60 @ 1000 and the capitalize_receipt fact of 60000 - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#carries the remainder on a second layer one minor unit dearer, so Σ the layers is Σ the draws - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#debits inventory and credits GRNI for a receipt, debits COGS and credits inventory for a handoff, the reverse for a restore - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#debits the adjustment account for a loss or a write-off and credits it for a gain - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#is the line’s cost plus its landed share per unit, to the nearest minor unit - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#shares by quantity to the minor unit, the last line taking the rounding remainder - >- Examined reference: services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/unit/cost/cost-rules.spec.js#shares by value: a line worth three times another takes three times the landed cost coverage: rule: covered transition: 'gap: FND-COM-ORD-075' validation: covered permission: 'gap: FND-COM-ORD-075' edge: 'gap: FND-COM-ORD-075' failure: covered boundary: covered concurrency: 'gap: FND-COM-ORD-075' invariant: 'gap: FND-COM-ORD-075' interaction: covered coverage_definition: Covered means a design scenario exists; executable coverage and execution results are separate. permission_coverage: - key: commerce.purchasing.create where_checked: api scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 note: >- The listed examples do not establish a complete allow-and-deny matrix for this key; unused catalogue keys need no invented route. provenance: unknown source: FND-COM-ORD-075 - key: commerce.purchasing.read where_checked: api scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 note: >- The listed examples do not establish a complete allow-and-deny matrix for this key; unused catalogue keys need no invented route. provenance: unknown source: FND-COM-ORD-075 - key: commerce.inventory-costing.read where_checked: api scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 note: >- The listed examples do not establish a complete allow-and-deny matrix for this key; unused catalogue keys need no invented route. provenance: unknown source: FND-COM-ORD-075 - key: commerce.inventory-costing.update where_checked: api scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 note: >- The listed examples do not establish a complete allow-and-deny matrix for this key; unused catalogue keys need no invented route. provenance: unknown source: FND-COM-ORD-075 - key: commerce.inventory-costing.create where_checked: api scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 note: >- The listed examples do not establish a complete allow-and-deny matrix for this key; unused catalogue keys need no invented route. provenance: unknown source: FND-COM-ORD-075 - key: commerce.inventory-costing.delete where_checked: api scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 note: >- The listed examples do not establish a complete allow-and-deny matrix for this key; unused catalogue keys need no invented route. provenance: unknown source: FND-COM-ORD-075 - key: commerce.inventory-costing.bulk where_checked: api scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 note: >- The listed examples do not establish a complete allow-and-deny matrix for this key; unused catalogue keys need no invented route. provenance: unknown source: FND-COM-ORD-075 transition_coverage: - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: draft to: issued trigger: Staff move the stock order into issue. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#drafts the order numbered with its line and issues it note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: issued to: partially_received trigger: Goods arrival covers part of the outstanding remainder. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#records the first receipt numbered, against the order, with one line of 60 at the order line’s cost, and the order partially received note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: partially_received to: received trigger: Receipt or quantity cancellation removes the final remainder. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#receives the remaining 40 and the order is received with its instant; the two layers stand oldest first note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: issued to: received trigger: Full receipt or line cancellation removes all outstanding units. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/persistence/purchase-orders.ts:cancelPurchaseOrderLineQuantity note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: partially_received to: closed trigger: Staff conclude a partly received order. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#closes an issued order after 90 of 100: cancelled_quantity 10, status closed; cancelling it instead is refused note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: issued to: closed trigger: Staff conclude an issued order. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/persistence/purchase-orders.ts:closePurchaseOrder' note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: received to: closed trigger: Staff conclude a fully received order. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/persistence/purchase-orders.ts:closePurchaseOrder' note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: draft to: cancelled trigger: Staff end a draft stock order. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/persistence/purchase-orders.ts:cancelPurchaseOrder' note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' - state_model: STATE-COM-ORD-013 from: issued to: cancelled trigger: Staff end an issued stock order without delivery. scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/persistence/purchase-orders.ts:cancelPurchaseOrder' note: 'Individual examples do not exhaustively prove this transition, its guard and side effects.' invariant_coverage: - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-01 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#answers the retried receipt as found under its key, writing nothing twice note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-02 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt beyond what the line has open (over_receipt) and a receipt against a received order, writing nothing note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-03 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#writes, in the receipt’s transaction, the receipt movement naming the line, the layer of 60 @ 1000 and the capitalize_receipt fact of 60000 note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-04 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/db/inventory-cost-layers.table.ts:inventory_cost_layers_remaining_check, inventory_cost_layers_receipt_line_check note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-05 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/db/cost-relief.table.ts:cost_relief_total_check' note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-06 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#lists the unposted facts by date, stamps them posted once under Accounting’s reference, and refuses another reference on a posted fact note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-07 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#rewrites nothing made before the switch: the FIFO relief rows read back unchanged, the receipt layers still record fifo note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-08 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#refuses a receipt against the received order 409, a receipt line with no quantity 400, and the vendor’s delete 409 note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-09 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#replaces the draft at the version read with the record exactly as it was read, read-only line columns included, and answers the same lines one version on note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. - invariant: INV-DOM-COM-ORD-006-10 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: unknown source: >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/db/purchase-orders.table.ts:purchase_orders_closed_check, purchase_orders_cancelled_check note: Broader invariant coverage remains open beyond the concrete examples. workflow_coverage: - workflow: WF-COM-ORD-013 scenarios: - ATS-COM-ORD-016-13 gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: proposed source: - 'services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js' - >- services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js#authorizes at once under the built-in policy: the RMA numbered with its deadline, the lines authorized, the customer told to send it back - >- services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js#lets the approver reject one with a reason; a member on the console route and a clerk are refused - >- services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js#takes the warehouse’s receipt: the goods back on the line, the memo and the refund run, the document completed and the RMA closed - >- services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/e2e/returns.e2e.spec.js#charges the policy’s 10% restocking fee as an invoice paid from the freed money, and refunds the rest - 'services-commerce:modules/operations/services/reconciler/reconciler.ts' - workflow: WF-COM-ORD-015 scenarios: - ATS-COM-ORD-018-18 gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: proposed source: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#refuses a receipt line whose cost differs from the order line’s without a reason, and takes one with a reason - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#fills the two backorders at the first receipt, oldest first, converting them to committed; the shelf shows 58 available after - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/e2e/purchasing.e2e.spec.js#lists the facts unposted (the two receipts’), stamps them posted under Accounting’s reference, and lists none unposted after - workflow: WF-COM-ORD-016 scenarios: [] gap: FND-COM-ORD-075 provenance: proposed source: - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#relieves units no layer covers at cost zero under no layer and raises uncosted_relief, so the books say so - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#restores the LIFO relief at its recorded costs and places: each relief reversed, the layers dated with the originals, a restore_cogs of 14000 - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#values a count gain at the last receipt cost (adjustment_gain) and relieves a count loss (adjustment_loss), each fact naming the count line - 'services-commerce:modules/purchasing/services/cost/transfer-cost.ts' - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#moves the unconsumed remainder to a layer at the corrected cost, leaves the original consumed, and writes the cost_adjustment of the difference - >- services-commerce:modules/purchasing/tests/integration/services/receiving/purchasing-flow.integration.spec.js#raises valuation_mismatch on stock no layer costs, relief_missing on a shipment movement no relief followed, and nothing on the reconciled items interaction_coverage: - with: CAP-COM-ORD-016 scenarios: - ATS-COM-ORD-018-17 unproved_rules: [] --- # Receive inventory and retain its cost: Capability Test Specification ## Coverage | Rule | Scenario or finding | |---|---| | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-01` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-01`, `ATS-COM-ORD-018-18` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-02` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-02` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-03` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-03` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-04` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-04` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-05` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-05` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-06` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-06` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-07` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-07` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-08` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-08`, `ATS-COM-ORD-018-17` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-09` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-09` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-10` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-10` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-11` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-11` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-12` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-12` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-13` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-16` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-14` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-14` | | `BR-CAP-COM-ORD-018-15` | `ATS-COM-ORD-018-15` | ## Interactions With Related Capabilities Returned goods restore their original acquisition cost. A shipped line has identified layer relief and a receipt-based return authorization. Receive part of the goods and then the remainder; inspect cost restoration and settlement. Crossing workflow examples also cover preparation, commitment and recovery at their service handoffs. Their structured bindings distinguish specified outcomes from executable evidence.