---
id: TST-COM-ORD-144
title: The tender refusal sentences
kind: unit
product_area: commerce
module: orders
revision: 1
status: draft
source_sha:
  services-commerce: c8b66a98e2490617aec38ba5c8165dd9bd0a8f9b
repository: services-commerce
files:
  - modules/orders/tests/unit/tender/tender-refusal-wording.spec.js
implements: []
environment: mock
implementation_state: implemented
latest_result: not-run
latest_run_at: null
latest_run_ref: null
conformance: not-verified
estimated_minutes: 1
isolation: 'The suite owns its in-memory inputs, scripted responses and rendered component state.'
evidence:
  - provenance: test
    source: 'services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/unit/tender/tender-refusal-wording.spec.js'
    test_cases:
      - 'gives the tender window sentence plain beside the code, as the one problem of the details'
      - 'names the checkout policy, not the ordering profile, when a tender kind is not allowed'
scenario_coverage: []
dependency_evidence:
  provenance: test
  source: 'services-commerce:modules/orders/tests/unit/tender/tender-refusal-wording.spec.js'
  declared_by_test: 'the refusal builders. Doubled: nothing.'
---

# The tender refusal sentences

## Verification Boundary

The unit suite checks the named contract or helper with controlled inputs.

## What This Suite Proves

The registered cases check the tender refusal sentences with their fixture records and assertions. Scenario bindings name only the examples those cases exercise.

## What It Does Not Prove

A registered file supplies no run result or verified conformance by itself. Local fixtures do not establish deployed cross-service behavior or complete browser journeys.

## Real Dependencies and Test Doubles

Inputs and external responses are controlled in process; this suite establishes no deployed service behavior.

## Must Not Be Doubled

The named contract validation or component behavior under assertion must use its actual implementation.