--- id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012 scope: CAP-CRM-DQ-012 product_area: crm module: data-quality revision: 1 status: proposed source_sha: services-crm: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69 react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f scenarios: - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-01 title: Participant validation prevents invalid plans level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-01 preconditions: Prepare workspace records and an absorbed identity. steps: >- Try one participant, eleven, a repeat, an outside survivor and the absorbed record. expected: Invalid selections fail and the absorbed participant reports its survivor. negative: true data_needs: The existing scenario setup supplies the required records. bound_to: - TST-CRM-DQ-181 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.integration.spec.js#refuses a plan of one record, which is not a merge, as ObjectInvalid naming the field category: boundary execution_sources: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.integration.spec.js#refuses a plan of one record, which is not a merge, as ObjectInvalid naming the field - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.integration.spec.js#refuses more records than a merge takes - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.integration.spec.js#refuses the same record named twice - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.integration.spec.js#refuses a survivor that is not one of the records being merged - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-execution.integration.spec.js#refuses to plan a merge of an id it has merged away, naming the merged record - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-02 title: Plan authority requires the type's complete permission pair level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-02 preconditions: >- Prepare contact-only authority, organization merge-only, read-only and merge-without-read callers. steps: Request contact and organization plans. expected: Every incomplete type-specific read-and-merge pair is refused. negative: true data_needs: The existing scenario setup supplies the required records. bound_to: - TST-CRM-DQ-183 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#refuses the plan to a caller who may merge contacts but not organizations category: permission execution_sources: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#refuses the plan to a caller who may merge contacts but not organizations - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#refuses the plan of contacts to a caller who may merge organizations alone - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#refuses an organization plan to a caller who may read organizations but not merge them - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#refuses every plan route to a caller who may read contacts but not merge them - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-03 title: Survivor ranking explains the winning signal level: unit proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-03 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-05 preconditions: >- Prepare participants distinguished by login, integration identity, inbound references and creation age. steps: Compute the recommendation. expected: >- Signals apply in that order, reasons use record names, age-only ranking is weak and recency or completeness does not win. negative: false data_needs: The existing scenario setup supplies the required records. bound_to: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the only participant a portal login names - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the only participant an integration addresses, when no login separates them - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the participant the most rows outside the merge name, when no identity separates them - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the record created first, when nothing else separates them - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#is not decisive when the top two are still level after the references rule - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#never keeps the newest record, whatever it holds beyond the rules - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#never hands a reader a record id, the records being named by their names instead provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the only participant a portal login names category: rule execution_sources: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the only participant a portal login names - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the only participant an integration addresses, when no login separates them - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the participant the most rows outside the merge name, when no identity separates them - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#keeps the record created first, when nothing else separates them - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#is not decisive when the top two are still level after the references rule - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#never keeps the newest record, whatever it holds beyond the rules - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js#never hands a reader a record id, the records being named by their names instead binding_note: >- The exact unit-test references remain bound as engineering evidence; unit files are not executable suite artifacts. - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-04 title: Administrators can override the survivor suggestion level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-04 preconditions: A named participant differs from the recommendation. steps: Create plans with and without an explicit survivor. expected: 'The named selection remains, while omission uses the recommendation.' negative: false data_needs: The existing scenario setup supplies the required records. bound_to: - TST-CRM-DQ-181 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/survivor-recommendation.integration.spec.js#leaves the survivor the request named alone, the recommendation being advisory category: rule execution_sources: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/survivor-recommendation.integration.spec.js#leaves the survivor the request named alone, the recommendation being advisory - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/survivor-recommendation.integration.spec.js#is the survivor of a plan that named none, the default being the recommendation - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-05 title: Participant changes preserve only applicable decisions level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-08 preconditions: A three-record plan holds decisions. steps: Remove one participant and read again after data changes. expected: >- Two participants remain and invalidated decisions are removed with explanations. negative: false data_needs: The existing scenario setup supplies the required records. bound_to: - TST-CRM-DQ-183 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#answers the change with the two records that are left, in record_ids and in records category: transition execution_sources: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#answers the change with the two records that are left, in record_ids and in records - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/merge-decisions.spec.js#is dropped and reported when the plan is simply read again after the data moved on - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-06 title: The expiry sweep respects stored deadlines level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-10 preconditions: >- Create overdue undecided and blocked plans, a completed plan and a ready plan whose stored deadline is later. steps: Run the sweep at a fixed time and repeat it. expected: >- The overdue undecided and blocked plans are expired; the completed and not-yet-due plans retain their standing; repetition expires nothing. negative: false data_needs: The existing scenario setup supplies the required records. bound_to: - TST-CRM-DQ-181 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js#expires the plan whose seven days are up, which is what takes it off the reader’s list category: transition execution_sources: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js#expires the plan whose seven days are up, which is what takes it off the reader’s list - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js#expires a blocked plan too, a plan nobody cleared being as abandoned as one nobody decided - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js#leaves a plan that has been executed, whose merge happened and is nothing to close out - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.integration.spec.js#gives it the seven days a plan lives for when nobody states another proof_limitations: - Renewal after editing is not established. - An executing plan can also be expired; the rule and design disagree. - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-07 title: Queue launch displays survivor reasoning level: browser proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-03 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-04 preconditions: >- Prepare groups with login, external-identity, reference and age distinctions. steps: Launch their plans from the queue. expected: The displayed recommendation and explanation follow the recorded ranking. negative: false data_needs: The existing scenario setup supplies the required records. bound_to: - TST-CRM-DQ-176 provenance: test source: >- react-console:acceptance/crm/playwright/journeys/merging/CRM-ACC-0248.spec.ts#CRM-ACC-0248 category: interaction execution_sources: - >- react-console:acceptance/crm/playwright/journeys/merging/CRM-ACC-0248.spec.ts#CRM-ACC-0248 - >- react-console:acceptance/crm/playwright/journeys/merging/CRM-ACC-0285.spec.ts#CRM-ACC-0285 - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-08 title: >- Observe needs_decisions becoming expired after the expiry sweep finds an overdue working preview category: transition level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-12 transition: model: STATE-CRM-DQ-004 index: 11 from: needs_decisions to: expired guard: Only executed and already-expired plans are excluded. side_effects: - mark expiry and advance the version preconditions: >- Arrange needs_decisions standing with the transition guard satisfied: Only executed and already-expired plans are excluded. steps: The expiry sweep finds an overdue working preview. expected: >- Read the expired standing and inspect the associated changes: mark expiry and advance the version. negative: false data_needs: >- Fixtures for needs_decisions, the guard and the affected records; a fixed clock for time-dependent changes. source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js#expires a blocked plan too, a plan nobody cleared being as abandoned as one nobody decided design_sources: - STATE-CRM-DQ-004 note: >- The design supplies this transition obligation. A runtime binding requires assertions for its guard, destination and associated writes in one sequence. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed intent_alignment: >- The scenario records stored-deadline expiry in the design, including executing standing. It does not prove the capability rule’s last-change lifetime; the existing contradiction remains open. finding: FND-CRM-DQ-006 execution_sources: [] - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-09 title: >- Observe ready becoming expired after the expiry sweep finds an overdue ready preview category: transition level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-12 transition: model: STATE-CRM-DQ-004 index: 12 from: ready to: expired guard: Only executed and already-expired plans are excluded. side_effects: - mark expiry preconditions: >- Arrange ready standing with the transition guard satisfied: Only executed and already-expired plans are excluded. steps: The expiry sweep finds an overdue ready preview. expected: 'Read the expired standing and inspect the associated changes: mark expiry.' negative: false data_needs: >- Fixtures for ready, the guard and the affected records; a fixed clock for time-dependent changes. source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js#expires a blocked plan too, a plan nobody cleared being as abandoned as one nobody decided design_sources: - STATE-CRM-DQ-004 note: >- The design supplies this transition obligation. A runtime binding requires assertions for its guard, destination and associated writes in one sequence. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed intent_alignment: >- The scenario records stored-deadline expiry in the design, including executing standing. It does not prove the capability rule’s last-change lifetime; the existing contradiction remains open. finding: FND-CRM-DQ-006 execution_sources: [] - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-10 title: >- Observe blocked becoming expired after the expiry sweep finds an overdue blocked preview category: transition level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-12 transition: model: STATE-CRM-DQ-004 index: 13 from: blocked to: expired guard: Only executed and already-expired plans are excluded. side_effects: - mark expiry preconditions: >- Arrange blocked standing with the transition guard satisfied: Only executed and already-expired plans are excluded. steps: The expiry sweep finds an overdue blocked preview. expected: 'Read the expired standing and inspect the associated changes: mark expiry.' negative: false data_needs: >- Fixtures for blocked, the guard and the affected records; a fixed clock for time-dependent changes. source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js#expires a blocked plan too, a plan nobody cleared being as abandoned as one nobody decided design_sources: - STATE-CRM-DQ-004 note: >- The design supplies this transition obligation. A runtime binding requires assertions for its guard, destination and associated writes in one sequence. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed intent_alignment: >- The scenario records stored-deadline expiry in the design, including executing standing. It does not prove the capability rule’s last-change lifetime; the existing contradiction remains open. finding: FND-CRM-DQ-006 execution_sources: [] - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-11 title: >- Observe executing becoming expired after the expiry sweep finds an overdue active attempt’s plan category: transition level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-12 transition: model: STATE-CRM-DQ-004 index: 14 from: executing to: expired guard: Executing standing is not excluded by the sweep. side_effects: - mark expiry while the attempt may still execute preconditions: >- Arrange executing standing with the transition guard satisfied: Executing standing is not excluded by the sweep. steps: The expiry sweep finds an overdue active attempt’s plan. expected: >- Read the expired standing and inspect the associated changes: mark expiry while the attempt may still execute. negative: false data_needs: >- Fixtures for executing, the guard and the affected records; a fixed clock for time-dependent changes. source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.ts:expireRecordMergePlans design_sources: - STATE-CRM-DQ-004 note: >- The design supplies this transition obligation. A runtime binding requires assertions for its guard, destination and associated writes in one sequence. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed intent_alignment: >- The scenario records stored-deadline expiry in the design, including executing standing. It does not prove the capability rule’s last-change lifetime; the existing contradiction remains open. finding: FND-CRM-DQ-006 execution_sources: [] - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-12 title: Invalid participant lists cannot create a preview category: invariant level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-01 preconditions: >- Lists of one and eleven records, a repeated record and an outside survivor. steps: Create each proposed plan and inspect saved previews. expected: Every invalid list is refused without a saved plan. negative: false data_needs: >- Records, versions and caller contexts owned by the run; transaction failure injection when the invariant concerns rollback. bound_to: [] source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.ts:createRecordMergePlan; modules/merges/db/record-merge-plans.table.ts:record_merge_plans_record_ids_check design_sources: - DOM-CRM-DQ-003 execution_sources: [] provenance: proposed - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-13 title: A preview and its material hash cannot be stored separately category: invariant level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-02 preconditions: Direct plan rows containing only a computed preview or only its hash. steps: Attempt each incomplete database insert. expected: Both inserts are refused by the database. negative: false data_needs: >- Records, versions and caller contexts owned by the run; transaction failure injection when the invariant concerns rollback. bound_to: [] source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/db/record-merge-plans.table.ts:record_merge_plans_plan_hash_check design_sources: - DOM-CRM-DQ-003 execution_sources: [] provenance: proposed - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-14 title: A settled preview refuses another edit category: invariant level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-06 preconditions: 'Plans in executing, executed and expired standing.' steps: Try an answer or participant edit at the current version of each plan. expected: Every edit is refused and the stored preview stays unchanged. negative: false data_needs: >- Records, versions and caller contexts owned by the run; transaction failure injection when the invariant concerns rollback. bound_to: [] source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/services/merges/merge-plans.ts:assertPlanIsOpen design_sources: - DOM-CRM-DQ-003 execution_sources: [] provenance: proposed - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-15 title: Editing does not renew the stored expiry deadline category: invariant level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-12 preconditions: A plan near its stored creation-based expiry deadline. steps: 'Edit the plan, read its deadline and sweep after that stored instant.' expected: The deadline is unchanged and the sweep expires the edited plan. negative: false data_needs: >- Records, versions and caller contexts owned by the run; transaction failure injection when the invariant concerns rollback. bound_to: [] source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.ts:defaultExpiry, updateRecordMergePlan, expireRecordMergePlans design_sources: - DOM-CRM-DQ-003 execution_sources: [] provenance: proposed - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-16 title: Authority for only the other record type cannot create a plan category: invariant level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-13 preconditions: >- A context qualified for contact merging and an organization participant list. steps: Create the organization plan with the contact context. expected: The route refuses the plan before saving it. negative: false data_needs: >- Records, versions and caller contexts owned by the run; transaction failure injection when the invariant concerns rollback. bound_to: - TST-CRM-DQ-183 source: >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#refuses the plan to a caller who may merge contacts but not organizations design_sources: - DOM-CRM-DQ-003 execution_sources: - >- services-crm:modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js#refuses the plan to a caller who may merge contacts but not organizations provenance: test - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-17 title: A preview remains inaccessible in another workspace category: invariant level: api proves: - INV-DOM-CRM-DQ-003-14 preconditions: >- A saved plan and a current-version edit attempted through a different workspace. steps: Read and update the plan using the other workspace context. expected: The plan is unavailable and its records remain unchanged. negative: false data_needs: >- Records, versions and caller contexts owned by the run; transaction failure injection when the invariant concerns rollback. bound_to: [] source: >- services-crm:db/row-level-security.ts (record_merge_plans forced workspace policy) design_sources: - DOM-CRM-DQ-003 execution_sources: [] provenance: proposed - id: ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 title: Participant selection changes preview decisions before execution category: interaction level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-01 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-02 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-03 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-05 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-04 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-08 - BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-10 exercises: - CAP-CRM-DQ-012 - CAP-CRM-DQ-010 - CAP-CRM-DQ-013 - CAP-CRM-DQ-016 workflow_sources: - WF-CRM-DQ-005 - WF-CRM-DQ-007 preconditions: >- Run-owned contact and organization records, the relevant staff permissions and the related state described by the sequence. steps: >- Launch from a record, choose a different survivor, answer a conflict, remove a participant and execute the refreshed preview. expected: >- The plan retains only applicable decisions and execution uses the latest reviewed participants. negative: false data_needs: >- An isolated workspace with related records and fixed timestamps; owned participant failure injection where requested. source: >- CAP-CRM-DQ-012; CAP-CRM-DQ-010; CAP-CRM-DQ-013; CAP-CRM-DQ-016; WF-CRM-DQ-005; WF-CRM-DQ-007 note: >- This cumulative seam scenario remains proposed until one executable sequence establishes all of its outcomes. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed workflow_coverage_note: >- The workflows identify the handoffs under review. Separate assertions leave recovery and failure ordering unproved; the capability coverage finding records that limit. execution_sources: [] evidence: - repository: services-crm source_sha: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69 paths: - modules/merges/tests/e2e/merges.e2e.spec.js - >- modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-execution.integration.spec.js - >- modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/merge-plan-expiry.integration.spec.js - >- modules/merges/tests/integration/services/merges/survivor-recommendation.integration.spec.js - >- modules/merges/tests/integration/services/persistence/record-merge-plans.integration.spec.js - modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/merge-decisions.spec.js - >- modules/merges/tests/unit/services/planning/survivor-recommendation.spec.js note: >- Bindings identify authored proof; empty bindings remain proposed and findings record known limitations. - repository: react-console source_sha: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f paths: - acceptance/crm/playwright/journeys/merging/CRM-ACC-0248.spec.ts - acceptance/crm/playwright/journeys/merging/CRM-ACC-0285.spec.ts note: >- Bindings identify authored proof; empty bindings remain proposed and findings record known limitations. coverage: rule: covered transition: covered validation: 'gap: FND-CRM-DQ-063' permission: covered edge: 'gap: FND-CRM-DQ-063' failure: 'gap: FND-CRM-DQ-063' boundary: covered concurrency: 'gap: FND-CRM-DQ-063' invariant: covered interaction: covered coverage_notes: validation: >- No complete scenario currently isolates this category; the finding lists the remaining proof obligation. edge: >- No complete scenario currently isolates this category; the finding lists the remaining proof obligation. failure: >- No complete scenario currently isolates this category; the finding lists the remaining proof obligation. concurrency: >- No complete scenario currently isolates this category; the finding lists the remaining proof obligation. permission_coverage: - key: crm.contacts.merge scenario_ids: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-02 finding: FND-CRM-DQ-063 - key: crm.contacts.read scenario_ids: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-02 finding: FND-CRM-DQ-063 - key: crm.organizations.merge scenario_ids: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-02 finding: FND-CRM-DQ-063 - key: crm.organizations.read scenario_ids: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-02 finding: FND-CRM-DQ-063 proof_matrix: - rule: BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-01 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-01 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 - rule: BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-02 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-02 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 - rule: BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-03 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-03 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-07 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 - rule: BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-04 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-04 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-07 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 - rule: BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-05 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-03 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 - rule: BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-08 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-05 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 - rule: BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-10 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-06 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 interaction_coverage: related: - CAP-CRM-DQ-010 - CAP-CRM-DQ-013 - CAP-CRM-DQ-016 workflow_sources: - WF-CRM-DQ-005 - WF-CRM-DQ-007 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-07 - ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18 --- # Prepare a merge and choose its survivor: Capability Test Specification ## Coverage The rule matrix names the authored checks. A covered category means that a scenario exists; it does not report a passing execution. The coverage notes and findings identify missing checks, while execution sources retain the exact assertions inspected. | Required Rule | Scenarios | |---|---| | `BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-01` | `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-01`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-02` | `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-02`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-03` | `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-03`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-07`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-04` | `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-04`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-07`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-05` | `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-03`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-08` | `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-05`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-DQ-012-10` | `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-06`, `ATS-CRM-DQ-012-18` | ## Interactions With Related Capabilities Launch their plans from the queue. Launch from a record, choose a different survivor, answer a conflict, remove a participant and execute the refreshed preview. These sequences test the handoffs named in the interaction coverage record. A proposed sequence remains unbound until an executable run checks its combined outcome; component assertions alone leave that obligation open.