--- id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019 scope: CAP-CRM-ENT-019 product_area: crm module: entities revision: 1 status: proposed source_sha: services-crm: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69 react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f scenarios: - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-01 title: Settings answer only readable sections level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-01 preconditions: Prepare a caller who may read contact layouts only. steps: Read the settings. expected: >- The contacts section only; the organizations section and the default affiliation type absent. negative: true data_needs: Use personas by key. bound_to: - TST-CRM-ENT-786 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike category: permission action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike test_anchors: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is answered the section it may read - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the default affiliation type, which the affiliation types keys govern binding_scope: >- contributions: the cited executable assertions collectively support only the observations they contain; additional matrix and journey checks remain proposed. - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-02 title: Saves need every named section's key level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-02 - INV-DOM-CRM-ENT-033-13 preconditions: Prepare a caller who may update contact layouts only. steps: Save its own section; the other; both. expected: Saved; 403; 403 and neither written. negative: true data_needs: Use personas by key. bound_to: - TST-CRM-ENT-786 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#writes NEITHER section for that refused save: the decision is made before anything is written category: permission action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#writes NEITHER section for that refused save: the decision is made before anything is written assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#writes NEITHER section for that refused save: the decision is made before anything is written test_anchors: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#may save its own section - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused (403) when it saves the other section - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused (403) for a body naming both sections, though it may change one of them - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#writes NEITHER section for that refused save: the decision is made before anything is written binding_scope: >- contributions: the cited executable assertions collectively support only the observations they contain; additional matrix and journey checks remain proposed. - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-03 title: Version and unknown properties level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-03 preconditions: Prepare saved settings at version 1. steps: Save one section; save from version 0; save an unknown property. expected: The other section preserved; 409; 400. negative: true data_needs: No additional fixtures. bound_to: - TST-CRM-ENT-786 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a save from a stale version (409) category: concurrency action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a save from a stale version (409) assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a save from a stale version (409) test_anchors: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#saves a default and answers it, at version 1 - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#leaves a section a later save does not name - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a save from a stale version (409) - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses an unknown property rather than ignoring it (400) binding_scope: >- contributions: the cited executable assertions collectively support only the observations they contain; additional matrix and journey checks remain proposed. - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-04 title: Only fitting definitions may be chosen level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-04 preconditions: 'Prepare definitions of both purposes and types, one of another workspace.' steps: >- Choose an unknown id, another workspace’s, an organizations layout under contacts, a console form in the layout slot. expected: Each rejected naming the section and field. negative: true data_needs: No additional fixtures. bound_to: - TST-CRM-ENT-791 - TST-CRM-ENT-786 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot category: validation action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot test_anchors: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses an id no definition of the tenant has, naming the section and the field - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses another tenant’s definition - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the other purpose in a section: an organizations layout under contacts - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a definition of the organizations purpose on a contact type (400) binding_scope: >- contributions: the cited executable assertions collectively support only the observations they contain; additional matrix and journey checks remain proposed. - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-05 title: Type assignments survive an unaware replacement level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-05 preconditions: Prepare a contact type with five assignments. steps: Replace it without them; patch one out; patch one to null. expected: All five preserved; that one cleared; that one cleared. negative: false data_needs: No additional fixtures. bound_to: - TST-CRM-ENT-786 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments category: interaction action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments test_anchors: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#CLEARS the one a PATCH removes, and keeps the rest: the opposite of the same silence in a PUT - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#clears one a PATCH replaces with null binding_scope: >- contributions: the cited executable assertions collectively support only the observations they contain; additional matrix and journey checks remain proposed. - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-06 title: Resolution of the definitions in force level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-06 preconditions: Prepare workspace defaults and a type with some assignments. steps: >- Resolve for the type; with no type; for console only; for an unknown type; with no record type. expected: Type then default then not configured; defaults; console types; 404; 400. negative: true data_needs: No additional fixtures. bound_to: - TST-CRM-ENT-786 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#falls back to the tenant’s default for a kind the type leaves empty category: rule action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#falls back to the tenant’s default for a kind the type leaves empty assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#falls back to the tenant’s default for a kind the type leaves empty test_anchors: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#answers the type’s own definition for the kind the type assigns - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#falls back to the tenant’s default for a kind the type leaves empty - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#says a kind nothing configures is not configured - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#answers only the console kinds for ?context=console - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a type_id the tenant does not have (404) rather than answering the defaults - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a request that names no entity (400) binding_scope: >- contributions: the cited executable assertions collectively support only the observations they contain; additional matrix and journey checks remain proposed. - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-07 title: Readers see the definitions in force but not the defaults level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-07 preconditions: Prepare a caller who may read contacts only. steps: Resolve contact definitions; organization ones; read the defaults. expected: Displayed; 403; 403. negative: true data_needs: No additional fixtures. bound_to: - TST-CRM-ENT-786 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused the tenant’s defaults (403): reading a record does not make one an administrator of layouts category: permission action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused the tenant’s defaults (403): reading a record does not make one an administrator of layouts assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused the tenant’s defaults (403): reading a record does not make one an administrator of layouts test_anchors: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is shown the contact definitions: being told which layout is in force is part of reading the record - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused the organization ones (403): the key is the entity’s own - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused the tenant’s defaults (403): reading a record does not make one an administrator of layouts binding_scope: >- contributions: the cited executable assertions collectively support only the observations they contain; additional matrix and journey checks remain proposed. - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-08 title: Invalid layout assignment preserves the previous settings category: failure level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-04 - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-03 preconditions: A valid workspace default layout is already assigned. steps: >- Attempt to replace it with a form definition in the layout slot and reread settings. expected: >- The refusal names the invalid slot and leaves the previous assignment and settings version unchanged. negative: true data_needs: Run-owned records and configuration in an isolated workspace. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot test_anchors: [] action_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot assertion_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot binding_scope: 'unbound: the detailed scenario still needs executable proof.' - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-09 title: Settings do not expose the affiliation default through layout-only access category: interaction level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-017-06 - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-01 preconditions: A caller may read contact layouts but cannot read affiliation types. steps: 'Read settings with that access, then with affiliation-type read added.' expected: >- The layout-only response omits the default affiliation type; the additional catalogue authority exposes it. negative: false data_needs: Run-owned records and configuration in an isolated workspace. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/affiliation-types.e2e.spec.js#refuses a caller who may only read affiliation types the change of the default (403); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike exercises: - CAP-CRM-ENT-017 - CAP-CRM-ENT-019 workflows: [] test_anchors: [] action_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/affiliation-types.e2e.spec.js#refuses a caller who may only read affiliation types the change of the default (403); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike assertion_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/affiliation-types.e2e.spec.js#refuses a caller who may only read affiliation types the change of the default (403); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike binding_scope: 'unbound: the detailed scenario still needs executable proof.' - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-10 title: Classification edits retain their presentation assignments category: interaction level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-018-07 - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-05 preconditions: A contact classification has all five form and layout slots assigned. steps: >- Replace its ordinary classification fields without the slots; then clear one slot with a patch and resolve definitions. expected: >- Replacement retains every assignment; clearing one slot changes only that slot’s effective inheritance. negative: false data_needs: Run-owned records and configuration in an isolated workspace. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/contact-types.e2e.spec.js#then, when the version is off, refuses the change (409); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments exercises: - CAP-CRM-ENT-018 - CAP-CRM-ENT-019 workflows: [] test_anchors: [] action_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/contact-types.e2e.spec.js#then, when the version is off, refuses the change (409); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments assertion_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/contact-types.e2e.spec.js#then, when the version is off, refuses the change (409); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments binding_scope: 'unbound: the detailed scenario still needs executable proof.' - id: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11 title: Exercise every declared authority independently category: permission level: api proves: - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-01 - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-02 - BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-07 preconditions: >- An eligible record and configuration fixture exist for each operation; the caller can reach only the run’s workspace. steps: >- For each declared permission, execute its matching operation with that permission, then without it while retaining the other required grants. Read affected records after every refused mutation. expected: >- The authorized case reaches the operation; the missing-grant case is refused and preserves saved data. Record access alone does not authorize the other declared actions. negative: true data_needs: Run-owned records and configuration in an isolated workspace. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:aws/crm.service.ts:ApplicationPermissions; services-crm:modules/entities/aws/api/entities.routes.ts permission_keys: - crm.contact-layouts.read - crm.contact-layouts.update - crm.organization-layouts.read - crm.organization-layouts.update - crm.contacts.read - crm.organizations.read test_anchors: [] action_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:aws/crm.service.ts:ApplicationPermissions; services-crm:modules/entities/aws/api/entities.routes.ts assertion_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- services-crm:aws/crm.service.ts:ApplicationPermissions; services-crm:modules/entities/aws/api/entities.routes.ts binding_scope: 'unbound: the detailed scenario still needs executable proof.' evidence: - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is answered the section it may read - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the default affiliation type, which the affiliation types keys govern - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#writes NEITHER section for that refused save: the decision is made before anything is written - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#may save its own section - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused (403) when it saves the other section - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused (403) for a body naming both sections, though it may change one of them - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a save from a stale version (409) - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#saves a default and answers it, at version 1 - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#leaves a section a later save does not name - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses an unknown property rather than ignoring it (400) - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the wrong kind: a console form in the console page layout slot - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses an id no definition of the tenant has, naming the section and the field - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses another tenant’s definition - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/integration/services/persistence/crm-settings.integration.spec.js#refuses a definition of the other purpose in a section: an organizations layout under contacts - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a definition of the organizations purpose on a contact type (400) - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#CLEARS the one a PATCH removes, and keeps the rest: the opposite of the same silence in a PUT - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#clears one a PATCH replaces with null - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#falls back to the tenant’s default for a kind the type leaves empty - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#answers the type’s own definition for the kind the type assigns - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#says a kind nothing configures is not configured - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#answers only the console kinds for ?context=console - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a type_id the tenant does not have (404) rather than answering the defaults - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#refuses a request that names no entity (400) - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused the tenant’s defaults (403): reading a record does not make one an administrator of layouts - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is shown the contact definitions: being told which layout is in force is part of reading the record - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is refused the organization ones (403): the key is the entity’s own - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/affiliation-types.e2e.spec.js#refuses a caller who may only read affiliation types the change of the default (403); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#is not answered the section it may not read: it is ABSENT, not null, so "forbidden" and "unset" never look alike - >- services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/contact-types.e2e.spec.js#then, when the version is off, refuses the change (409); services-crm:modules/entities/tests/e2e/page-layouts.e2e.spec.js#KEEPS all five through a PUT that does not mention them: an older client cannot wipe a tenant’s assignments - >- services-crm:aws/crm.service.ts:ApplicationPermissions; services-crm:modules/entities/aws/api/entities.routes.ts coverage: rule: covered transition: 'gap: FND-CRM-ENT-067' validation: covered permission: covered edge: 'gap: FND-CRM-ENT-067' failure: covered boundary: 'gap: FND-CRM-ENT-067' concurrency: covered invariant: 'gap: FND-CRM-ENT-067' interaction: covered previous_approval: revision: 1 approved_by: Andrew approved_at: '2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z' coverage_notes: transition: reason: >- No detailed transition scenario currently specifies this aspect; the coverage finding records the required follow-through. provenance: unknown source: FND-CRM-ENT-067 edge: reason: >- No detailed edge scenario currently specifies this aspect; the coverage finding records the required follow-through. provenance: unknown source: FND-CRM-ENT-067 boundary: reason: >- No detailed boundary scenario currently specifies this aspect; the coverage finding records the required follow-through. provenance: unknown source: FND-CRM-ENT-067 invariant: reason: >- No detailed invariant scenario currently specifies this aspect; the coverage finding records the required follow-through. provenance: unknown source: FND-CRM-ENT-067 coverage_findings: - FND-CRM-ENT-067 - FND-CRM-ENT-075 permission_coverage: - key: crm.contact-layouts.read where_checked: api scenario: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md - key: crm.contact-layouts.update where_checked: api scenario: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md - key: crm.organization-layouts.read where_checked: api scenario: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md - key: crm.organization-layouts.update where_checked: api scenario: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md - key: crm.contacts.read where_checked: api scenario: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md - key: crm.organizations.read where_checked: api scenario: ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md related_coverage: - capability: CAP-CRM-ENT-017 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-ENT-019-09 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md:related - capability: CAP-CRM-ENT-018 scenarios: - ATS-CRM-ENT-019-10 provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/planning/capabilities/CAP-CRM-ENT-019-choose-the-page-layouts-and-forms-contacts-and-organizations.md:related examination_evidence: provenance: documented source: 'rhythm-v2-docs:specs/crm/entities/reports/EXAMINATION-2026-10-23.md' heading_conflict: FND-CRM-ENT-075 --- # Resolve the forms and layouts used for CRM records ## Coverage The category map separates specified cases from recorded gaps. A proposed case describes proof to implement; a binding identifies the assertions supplied by an existing executable file. The permission and transition ledgers record the individual checks needed for the capability. | Required rule | Scenario or finding | |---|---| | `BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-01` | `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-01`, `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-09`, `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-02` | `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-02`, `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-03` | `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-03`, `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-08` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-04` | `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-04`, `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-08` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-05` | `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-05`, `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-10` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-06` | `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-06` | | `BR-CAP-CRM-ENT-019-07` | `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-07`, `ATS-CRM-ENT-019-11` | ## Interactions With Related Capabilities The interaction scenarios exercise configure affiliation types and contact roles; organize the workspace’s record classifications. They change one part of a prepared record and inspect the dependent outcome. Unbound interactions remain proposed rather than implying an existing end-to-end implementation. ## Source Evidence The frontmatter pins the repositories and identifies the source anchors for each scenario. Bindings record inspected assertions, while unbound cases remain proposed. Source inspection supplies no execution result or product approval.