---
title: Data Job Engine Testing Back-Fill — 2026-10-23
examined_at: '2026-10-23'
examiner: codex
source_sha:
  services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1
  macroservice-libraries: 54536a441935c6e09fdb7f96f0bec71c52ba4e03
  services-crm: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69
  services-membership: 5994c270e8a37a30f848e99ba5b5ee6b87c08893
  react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f
branch: agent/platform-data-job-engine-testing-1
counts:
  specifications_extended: 20
  scenarios_added_by_category:
    rule: 0
    transition: 0
    validation: 0
    permission: 0
    edge: 0
    failure: 2
    boundary: 1
    concurrency: 0
    invariant: 2
    interaction: 66
  feature_suites_written: 6
  feature_scenarios_written: 30
  executable_suites_registered: 197
  bindings_made: 178
  gaps_recorded: 24
  inconsistencies_recorded: 1
binding_corrections:
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-017-01
    binding: >-
      react-console:acceptance/crm/playwright/journeys/data-operations/CRM-ACC-0674.spec.ts#CRM-ACC-0674
    reason: blocked placeholder
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-017-07
    binding: >-
      react-console:acceptance/crm/playwright/journeys/data-operations/CRM-ACC-0673.spec.ts#CRM-ACC-0673
    reason: blocked placeholder
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-004-06
    removed_binding:
      - TST-PFM-DJE-063
    reason: 'The browser asserts import entry access, not job control visibility and requests.'
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-008-05
    removed_binding:
      - TST-PFM-DJE-058
    reason: >-
      The custom-field branch is conditional and records that the case is not provable when the
      field is unavailable.
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-006-07
    removed_binding:
      - TST-PFM-DJE-043
    replacement_binding:
      - TST-PFM-DJE-030
    reason: >-
      The shared-engine integration assertions cover both stale and equal-revision patches; the
      browser does not assert the equal-revision second pass.
evidence:
  - specs/CONVENTIONS.md#9.10
  - specs/CONVENTIONS.md#5.3
  - specs/CONVENTIONS.md#10
remaining_proof:
  - FND-PFM-DJE-061
  - FND-PFM-DJE-062
  - FND-PFM-DJE-063
  - FND-PFM-DJE-064
  - FND-PFM-DJE-065
  - FND-PFM-DJE-066
  - FND-PFM-DJE-067
  - FND-PFM-DJE-068
  - FND-PFM-DJE-069
  - FND-PFM-DJE-070
  - FND-PFM-DJE-071
  - FND-PFM-DJE-072
  - FND-PFM-DJE-073
  - FND-PFM-DJE-074
  - FND-PFM-DJE-075
  - FND-PFM-DJE-076
  - FND-PFM-DJE-077
  - FND-PFM-DJE-078
  - FND-PFM-DJE-079
  - FND-PFM-DJE-080
  - FND-PFM-DJE-081
  - FND-PFM-DJE-082
  - FND-PFM-DJE-083
  - FND-PFM-DJE-084
  - FND-PFM-DJE-085
validation:
  corpus_check: 'passed: zero errors; 7348 warnings across the corpus'
  corpus_tests: 'passed: 7 tests'
  registered_suites: not-run
verification_limits:
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-012-07
    clause: Initial-import refusal in a live workspace is not executed by the bound historical-value case.
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-014-07
    clause: >-
      The bound case configures ten minutes; it does not establish the default fifteen-minute stall
      threshold.
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-020-01
    clause: The bound initial pass does not establish repeat invocation at the same month.
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-013-01
    clause: >-
      Updating a pre-existing record without a collection needs a persistence assertion showing that
      collection survives.
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-013-05
    clause: The inherited target assertions do not establish the absence of an organization email target.
  - scenario: ATS-PFM-DJE-016-03
    clause: >-
      Re-reading the valid run does not establish that every invalid request leaves no additional
      run record.
---

# Data Job Engine Testing Back-Fill

## Counts

The structured counts record moved and extended capability specifications, added scenarios by category, feature suites, registered executable suites, bindings and findings. Existing scenario identities remain permanent, and binding evidence retains the original file and test anchors.

## Verdict

The module has the requested testing hierarchy and an inventory of its existing executable suites at the pinned revisions. Coverage gaps, blocked browser callbacks and the unbound feature chains remain explicit findings. No registered suite is run or declared conformant by this documentation back-fill, and Product approval remains separate from implementation evidence.