---
id: FAS-PFM-ELG-06
feature: FEAT-PFM-ELG-06
product_area: platform
module: eligibility
revision: 2
status: proposed
product_intent: proposed
source_sha:
  services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1
  react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f
capabilities:
  - CAP-PFM-ELG-019
  - CAP-PFM-ELG-020
scenarios:
  - id: FAS-PFM-ELG-06-01
    title: Apply shared settings and personal choices to follow-up
    kind: behaviour
    exercises:
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-019
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-020
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-017
    relies_on:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-017-06
    preconditions: An adjustable advisory kind has reminders and two matching people.
    steps: >-
      Set shared policy, hide the advisory for one person and inspect lists and reminder plans for
      both.
    expected: >-
      Shared policy governs the kind while personal hiding affects only the owner’s presentation and
      plans.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Run-owned workspace records, separate caller grants and a controlled clock for time-dependent
      checks.
    bound_to: []
    provenance: proposed
    source:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-017-06
    action_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-017-06
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-017-06
    binding_scope: This sequence is proposed and has no executable proof binding.
  - id: FAS-PFM-ELG-06-02
    title: Stop queued delivery after a personal response or policy change
    kind: interaction
    exercises:
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-019
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-020
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-018
    relies_on:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-018-04
    preconditions: Two open occurrences have planned reminders under enabled policies.
    steps: Snooze one and disable the other policy before sending; inspect skips and outgoing requests.
    expected: Both queued reminders are suppressed for their current reason and no message is sent.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Run-owned workspace records, separate caller grants and a controlled clock for time-dependent
      checks.
    bound_to: []
    provenance: proposed
    source:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-018-04
    action_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-018-04
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-018-04
    binding_scope: This sequence is proposed and has no executable proof binding.
  - id: FAS-PFM-ELG-06-03
    title: Escalate once and stop follow-up when work closes
    kind: lifecycle
    exercises:
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-019
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-020
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-016
    relies_on:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-01
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-02
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-016-07
    preconditions: A configured overdue item has eligible escalation recipients.
    steps: 'Sweep twice, resolve the condition and invoke due reminder delivery.'
    expected: Only one escalation is recorded and resolution prevents later delivery.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Run-owned workspace records, separate caller grants and a controlled clock for time-dependent
      checks.
    bound_to: []
    provenance: proposed
    source:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-01
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-02
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-016-07
    action_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-01
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-02
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-016-07
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-01
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-02
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-05
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-016-07
    binding_scope: This sequence is proposed and has no executable proof binding.
  - id: FAS-PFM-ELG-06-04
    title: Protect shared policy while keeping choices private
    kind: permission
    exercises:
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-019
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-020
    relies_on:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-01
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-08
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
    preconditions: A manager and two ordinary staff members have different settings authority.
    steps: >-
      Attempt shared changes without management authority, set one person’s preferences and inspect
      the other person’s plans.
    expected: >-
      Unauthorized shared changes fail and one person’s private choice does not alter another
      person’s visibility or reminders.
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Run-owned workspace records, separate caller grants and a controlled clock for time-dependent
      checks.
    bound_to: []
    provenance: proposed
    source:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-01
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-08
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
    action_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-01
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-08
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-01
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-07
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-08
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-04
    binding_scope: This sequence is proposed and has no executable proof binding.
  - id: FAS-PFM-ELG-06-05
    title: Refuse stale shared settings without changing follow-up
    kind: regression
    exercises:
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-019
      - CAP-PFM-ELG-020
    relies_on:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-06
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
    preconditions: A manager has read settings before another accepted change.
    steps: >-
      Attempt replacement with the stale version and inspect audit, effective policy and next
      reminder planning.
    expected: >-
      The rejected replacement changes neither accepted policy nor its follow-up outcomes and adds
      no accepted-change audit.
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Run-owned workspace records, separate caller grants and a controlled clock for time-dependent
      checks.
    bound_to: []
    provenance: proposed
    source:
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-06
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
      - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
    action_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-06
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source:
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-020-06
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-03
        - ATS-PFM-ELG-019-05
    binding_scope: This sequence is proposed and has no executable proof binding.
evidence:
  - CAP-PFM-ELG-019
  - CAP-PFM-ELG-020
  - CAP-PFM-ELG-017
  - CAP-PFM-ELG-018
  - CAP-PFM-ELG-016
  - WF-PFM-ELG-017
  - WF-PFM-ELG-018
---

# Attention Follow-up and Settings: Feature Acceptance Suite

## What the Feature Must Do as a Whole

Workspace policy and private choices determine presentation and follow-up together. The scenarios revisit queued work after policy, response and lifecycle changes.

## Interactions Between Capabilities

Apply shared settings and personal choices to follow-up. Set shared policy, hide the advisory for one person and inspect lists and reminder plans for both.

Stop queued delivery after a personal response or policy change. Snooze one and disable the other policy before sending; inspect skips and outgoing requests.

Escalate once and stop follow-up when work closes. Sweep twice, resolve the condition and invoke due reminder delivery.

Protect shared policy while keeping choices private. Attempt shared changes without management authority, set one person’s preferences and inspect the other person’s plans.

Refuse stale shared settings without changing follow-up. Attempt replacement with the stale version and inspect audit, effective policy and next reminder planning.

## Regression Record

| Revision | Change | Scenarios | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial | All | Establish cumulative feature proof from the existing planning and design contracts. |