---
id: TST-PFM-INT-539
title: consent narrowing
kind: integration
product_area: platform
module: integrations
revision: 1
status: draft
source_sha:
  services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1
  macroservice-libraries: 54536a441935c6e09fdb7f96f0bec71c52ba4e03
  react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f
repository: services-platform
files:
  - modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js
implements:
  - ATS-PFM-INT-003-05
  - ATS-PFM-INT-008-02
environment: local
implementation_state: implemented
latest_result: not-run
latest_run_at: null
latest_run_ref: null
conformance: not-verified
estimated_minutes: 5
isolation: >-
  Use the suite-owned database fixtures and its declared cleanup; prepare the test database before
  integration or lifecycle execution.
evidence:
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js
test_cases:
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 4: premise: with the consent given, the refund through the business-unit binding reaches the
      adapter
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 4: refuses the refund 409 binding_ineligible
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 4: the trace authorization check failed naming payments.refund@1
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 4: the adapter receives no call
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 4: no payments.refund execution is recorded by the refused invocation
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 4: no attempt row is recorded by the refused invocation
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 6: refuses the refund 409 binding_ineligible
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 6: the trace authorization check failed naming payments.refund@1
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 6: the adapter receives no call
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 6: no payments.refund execution is recorded by the refused invocation
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js#INT-ACC-0509
      step 6: no attempt row is recorded by the refused invocation
    provenance: test
dependency_evidence:
  provenance: test
  source: >-
    services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/executions/consent-narrowing.integration.spec.js
  reviewed:
    - Suite introduction
    - Fixture setup
    - Client substitutions
    - Assertions and cleanup
---
# consent narrowing

## Verification Boundary

This database and service suite exercises consent narrowing. Its registration records the executable definition; no run result is asserted.

## What This Suite Proves

The bindings identify the detailed outcomes asserted by this suite. Test-level evidence retains the individual checks, including cases where several suites contribute to one scenario.

## What It Does Not Prove

In-process execution does not establish deployed infrastructure or a real provider response. Several bindings can supply different parts of a detailed scenario; no single-file completeness is implied.

## Real Dependencies and Test Doubles

The suite definition identifies its database fixtures and replaced clients, hooks, clocks or executors. Integration runs use the prepared database; lifecycle runs exercise the in-process route or adapter path.

## Must Not Be Doubled

The database constraints, transactions and service behavior claimed by an integration binding must execute. Replaced external seams cannot establish live provider or infrastructure behavior.