---
id: TST-PFM-INT-550
title: history and security trail
kind: integration
product_area: platform
module: integrations
revision: 1
status: draft
source_sha:
  services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1
  macroservice-libraries: 54536a441935c6e09fdb7f96f0bec71c52ba4e03
  react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f
repository: services-platform
files:
  - >-
    modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js
implements:
  - ATS-PFM-INT-003-02
  - ATS-PFM-INT-003-09
  - ATS-PFM-INT-004-06
environment: local
implementation_state: implemented
latest_result: not-run
latest_run_at: null
latest_run_ref: null
conformance: not-verified
estimated_minutes: 5
isolation: >-
  Use the suite-owned database fixtures and its declared cleanup; prepare the test database before
  integration or lifecycle execution.
evidence:
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js
test_cases:
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#is
      narrowed by the administrator, to exactly what they accept
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      the narrowing to the history and to the security trail
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#flags
      the narrowing as no widening on the security trail
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#flags
      a later acceptance of something the previous one lacked as a widening, and a mere re-statement as
      none
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#compares
      data scopes by value: narrowing that keeps one unchanged is no widening, a field added to a kept
      one is
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#is
      never widened beyond what the integration declares: refused, naming it, and nothing is written
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      who suspended it and why to the history
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      the suspension to the security trail, not as a widening
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      the resumption to the history and to the security trail, as a widening
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#records
      a refused suspension in neither trail
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#is
      not found by id in another tenant, which is left as it was
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      who suspended it and why to the history
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      the suspension to the security trail
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      the resumption to the history
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#is
      not found by id in another tenant, and records nothing there
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#refuses
      a suspension of a connection that is not active, recording it in neither trail
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      the entry of a key to the history and to the security trail, as a widening, and neither holds the
      key
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#writes
      the replacement to the history and to the security trail, naming the credential it superseded
    provenance: test
  - source: >-
      services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js#records
      a refused replacement (another method) in neither trail
    provenance: test
dependency_evidence:
  provenance: test
  source: >-
    services-platform:modules/integrations/tests/integration/services/installations/history-and-security-trail.integration.spec.js
  reviewed:
    - Suite introduction
    - Fixture setup
    - Client substitutions
    - Assertions and cleanup
---
# history and security trail

## Verification Boundary

This database and service suite exercises history and security trail. Its registration records the executable definition; no run result is asserted.

## What This Suite Proves

The bindings identify the detailed outcomes asserted by this suite. Test-level evidence retains the individual checks, including cases where several suites contribute to one scenario.

## What It Does Not Prove

In-process execution does not establish deployed infrastructure or a real provider response. Several bindings can supply different parts of a detailed scenario; no single-file completeness is implied.

## Real Dependencies and Test Doubles

The suite definition identifies its database fixtures and replaced clients, hooks, clocks or executors. Integration runs use the prepared database; lifecycle runs exercise the in-process route or adapter path.

## Must Not Be Doubled

The database constraints, transactions and service behavior claimed by an integration binding must execute. Replaced external seams cannot establish live provider or infrastructure behavior.