---
title: Integration Platform planning examination and final text
examined_at: 2026-10-22
examiner: codex
source_sha:
  rhythm-v2-docs: 7e2b9bffae5e0b515ff674b75adcac97d6373497
  services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1
  macroservice-libraries: 54536a441935c6e09fdb7f96f0bec71c52ba4e03
  react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f
branch: agent/platform-integrations-plan-exam-1
---
# Integration Platform planning examination

## Verdict for Andrew

The corrected planning layer describes the examined module at the pinned commits with explicit sources and findings, but it does not establish acceptance of every implemented behaviour. Its weakest areas are authority for extension registration, consent restoration, connected browser recovery and proof of complete host execution. Before design starts, the product should resolve the high-severity findings, record the outstanding product decisions and complete the proposed acceptance obligations.

## Examination scope and method

The examination starts from the authoring contract, planning templates, approved CRM entity examples and the module’s registered source boundary. Repository heads match the supplied source pins, so local source reads resolve to those commits. Concrete source files, named symbols, numeric line anchors, test titles, decision records, permission declarations, table constraints and console components are checked against the layer’s claims. A reference scan resolves all 744 unique structured repository citations across 189 distinct concrete cited files with zero missing file or anchor results; additional table and infrastructure inventories establish declaration coverage.

The named planning brief is absent from the supplied documentation tree. That limitation remains an explicit finding rather than an assumed brief. Test bindings describe inspected automated definitions; the source repositories’ integration and browser suites are not executed in this examination. Database triggers, access grants implemented outside registered paths, external application adoption and live deployments are not independently established.

All original artifacts receive OpenAI final text, including rules, examples, scenarios, facets, journey actions and assertions, acceptance fields, findings and actor descriptions. Verification commits precede separate final-text commits for each capability, acceptance set, concept, journey and feature; subsequent source and evidence corrections are separately identified in history. No approval is granted, no permanent identifier is reused and no source repository is modified.

## Counts examined

| Unit | Initial | Final |
|---|---|---|
| Module artifacts excluding this report | 61 | 65 |
| Features | 6 | 6 |
| Key concepts | 6 | 6 |
| Capability artifacts | 20 | 22, including 1 superseded |
| Acceptance sets | 20 | 22, including 1 superseded |
| Journeys | 6 | 6 |
| Rule rows | 193 | 210, including predecessor rows |
| Mandatory proof rules | 164 | 200, including predecessor rows |
| Capability illustration scenarios | 29 | 31 |
| Acceptance scenarios | 163 | 178, including predecessor scenarios |
| Journey steps / assertions | 30 / 14 | 30 / 14 |
| Platform actor rows | 7 | 7 |
| Findings / open questions | 24 / 4 | 34 / 4 |

Of the final acceptance scenarios, 161 have at least one existing test binding and 17 are explicitly proposed. A binding’s existence does not establish that its whole composite scenario passes. Every mandatory rule has an acceptance scenario or a named finding, and the acceptance sets expose the remaining unbound rules in their coverage tables.

## Declaration coverage

| Inventory | Covered / total | Capability or evidence mapping | Uncovered or unproved by name |
|---|---|---|---|
| API and service operations | 129 / 129 | Module charter operation ownership table; 127 literal declarations plus 2 generated data-grant operations | No unmapped operation; data query and projection remain unimplemented |
| Table declarations | 54 / 54 | Module charter persistent record ownership table | No unmapped table; external trigger and role-grant behaviour remains outside scope |
| Shared views | 2 / 2 | CAP-PFM-INT-020; runs and timers in one view declaration file | External host view population unproved |
| Permission keys | 21 / 21 | Module charter permission coverage table; Platform service declarations | Execution-reading key is declared but unused; some host operations are delegated |
| Module end-to-end definition files | 16 / 16 | Module charter end-to-end definition coverage table | No unmapped file; definitions are inspected, not rerun |
| State machines | 2 / 2 | CAP-PFM-INT-004 verification; CAP-PFM-INT-006 health | Deployed state machine operation unproved |
| Primary work queues | 4 / 4 | CAP-PFM-INT-009 executions; CAP-PFM-INT-013 webhooks; CAP-PFM-INT-014 deliveries; CAP-PFM-INT-015 events | Live queue processing unproved; companion dead-letter queues belong to these queue declarations |
| Schedules | 7 / 7 | CAP-PFM-INT-005 refresh and maintenance; CAP-PFM-INT-006 two health passes; CAP-PFM-INT-009 dispatch; CAP-PFM-INT-010 reconcile; message work dispatch across CAP-PFM-INT-013–015 | Live schedule operation unproved |
| Destination console screens | 19 / 19 | Module charter hosted screens, excluding the legacy redirect | Sync list and detail lack Platform support; four extension pages use sample data; workflow configuration screens are absent |
| Legacy inventory entries | 150 / 150 linked | Supersedes references across module artifacts | Adapter tooling and external consumers absorbed by identifier only, as the boundary finding records |
| Journeys | 6 / 6 | JNY-PFM-INT-001–006 | Complete wizard recovery, connected extensions and event-host execution lack full proof |

Coverage measures source ownership and declarations, not operational completeness. Calendar operations and records now map to the calendar capability; action and workflow recipes map to the recipe capability. The combined predecessor remains superseded. This produces twenty-one active outcomes, one above the target range, because recipe adoption and business-time scheduling have different users’ outcomes and acceptance obligations.

## Provable corrections

| Artifact | Verified correction |
|---|---|
| CAP-PFM-INT-001 | Separate release immutability from deployment replacement; correct current-release selection when the existing current release is not published; remove unsupported whole-rule database enforcement; add principal, runtime, environment, duplicate-capability and mode guards. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-003 | Describe acceptance against current declarations, including Rhythm permissions and restoration of previously withdrawn access; remove the narrow-only origin from that inconsistent implementation; distinguish subscription deletion from the approved instruction to stop them. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-004 | Limit upgrades to active or degraded accounts and describe newly introduced access checks rather than all unaccepted access; remove approval attributed to an unrecorded disconnection exception; restrict enforcement claims to supported layers. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-005 | Describe the retained fifty-record ceiling and deletion of unreferenced destroyed credentials instead of a lifetime limit; add the database refusal for more than one hundred authorization scopes. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-006 | Keep suspended-in-attention behaviour observed and unconfirmed; identify additional mandatory health and notice proofs. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-007 | Remove approval for the numerical history-retention limit; retain contract-major migration as observed but deferred; mark atomic replacement effects as mandatory proof. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-008 | Distinguish trace unit evidence from composite service proof; mark cache and read-only behaviour as mandatory proof. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-009 | Remove database attribution for composite rate limiting; retain request-key race and complete circuit-opening gaps; add the persisted request-key length refusal. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-010 | Separate the observed manifest-based deadline clamp from the approved contract exception; mark emitted completion behaviour as mandatory proof. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-011–015 | Mark additional refusals and side effects mandatory; correct event routing to retries that may redeliver to previously successful consumers, requiring deduplication. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-016 | Distinguish warning logs from alarms; allow empty neutral values while refusing null; add the supplied-service identity weakness in registration and its proposed acceptance obligation. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-017 | Replace browser proof claims for sample-backed extension screens with service-level acceptance; preserve the captured-payload and retention gaps. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-018 | Separate observable shared registry declarations from external role grants; add setup effects for declarations, shipped recipes and aggregated views. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-019 | Correct the calendar ceiling to one hundred, at most one default rather than an always-present default, and stale or locked write refusals; retain the artifact as superseded. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-021 / CAP-PFM-INT-022 | Allocate separate recipe and calendar outcomes and acceptance sets; keep predecessor identifiers and references; narrow each permission rule to its outcome. |
| ATS-PFM-INT-001 / 004 / 005 / 008 / 009 / 016 / 017 / 018 / 019 / 021 / 022 | Remove or strengthen partial test bindings, correct proof levels, add missing guard scenarios and expose unproved mandatory rules through findings. |
| JNY-PFM-INT-001 / 003 / 004 / 005 / 006 | Recover credentials from account detail rather than an unproved wizard control; use actual call-detail and manual completion sources; distinguish service configuration tests from connected browser or host execution. |
| CON-PFM-INT-005 | Explain the inferred relationship between separate customization event declarations and automation trigger registration; do not imply one unified runtime registry. |
| CON-PFM-INT-006 / FEAT-PFM-INT-06 / MOD-PFM-INT | Route recipe and calendar ownership to the new capabilities while retaining the combined predecessor’s history. |
| CAP-PFM-INT-002 / 003 / 004 / 006 / 007 / 008 / 009 / 010 / 011 / 012 / 018–022 | Change mixed capabilities to proposed where otherwise uncited details inherit confirmed intent; preserve specific recorded rule origins as the only confirmed authority. |
| FINDINGS.md / ID_REGISTRY.md / ACTORS-PFM | Normalize finding sources, reserve new identifiers before writing, preserve the unused reserved rule identifier and rewrite the seven role descriptions. |
| MOD-PFM-INT registry row | Advance only the module’s planning status to planning examined. |

## Artifact-by-artifact change ledger

Array positions below identify fields in the initial artifact; permanent row identifiers remain unchanged. Readable statements change wording throughout, while this ledger identifies metadata changes and added rows. Detailed before-and-after source values remain reviewable in the separate verification commits.

| Artifact | Protected metadata or new rows | Final text |
|---|---|---|
| `FINDINGS.md` | `finding_evidence[0].source`; `finding_evidence[1].source`; `finding_evidence[2].source`; `finding_evidence[3].source`; `finding_evidence[4].source`; `finding_evidence[7].source`; `finding_evidence[9].source`; `finding_evidence[10].source`; `finding_evidence[12].source`; `finding_evidence[13].source`; `finding_evidence[14].source`; `finding_evidence[17].source`; `finding_evidence[18].source`; `finding_evidence[19].source`; `finding_evidence[22].source` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ID_REGISTRY.md` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `MOD-PFM-INT` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-001` | `scenarios[7].bound_to`; `scenarios[7].provenance`; `scenarios[7].source`; new `ATS-PFM-INT-001-12` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-002` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-003` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-004` | `scenarios[3].level`; `scenarios[4].bound_to`; `scenarios[4].provenance`; `scenarios[4].source` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-005` | `scenarios[8].bound_to`; new `ATS-PFM-INT-005-12` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-006` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-007` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-008` | `scenarios[1].level` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-009` | `scenarios[2].bound_to`; `scenarios[2].provenance`; `scenarios[2].source`; `scenarios[7].bound_to`; `scenarios[7].provenance`; new `ATS-PFM-INT-009-12` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-010` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-011` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-012` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-013` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-014` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-015` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-016` | `scenarios[0].level`; `scenarios[4].level`; `scenarios[4].bound_to`; `scenarios[4].provenance`; `scenarios[4].source`; new `ATS-PFM-INT-016-07` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-017` | `scenarios[4].level`; `scenarios[9].level` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-018` | new `ATS-PFM-INT-018-05` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-019` | `status`; new `ATS-PFM-INT-019-08` | All readable text rewritten |
| `ATS-PFM-INT-020` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-001` | `rules[3].enforced_at`; `rules[3].provenance`; `rules[3].source`; `rules[6].enforced_at`; `rules[7].provenance`; `rules[7].source`; new `BR-CAP-PFM-INT-001-12` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-002` | `product_intent` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-003` | `product_intent`; `rules[1].provenance`; `rules[1].source`; `rules[1].origin`; `rules[5].enforced_at`; `rules[7].origin`; `rules[8].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-004` | `product_intent`; `rules[3].enforced_at`; `rules[6].origin`; `rules[9].provenance`; `rules[9].source`; `rules[9].origin`; `rules[10].must_prove`; `rules[11].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-005` | `rules[0].enforced_at`; `rules[9].must_prove`; `rules[12].enforced_at`; `rules[12].must_prove`; `rules[12].provenance`; `rules[12].source`; new `BR-CAP-PFM-INT-005-14` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-006` | `product_intent`; `rules[4].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-007` | `product_intent`; `rules[4].origin`; `rules[10].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-008` | `product_intent`; `rules[9].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-009` | `product_intent`; `rules[3].enforced_at`; new `BR-CAP-PFM-INT-009-13` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-010` | `product_intent`; `rules[3].origin`; `rules[7].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-011` | `product_intent`; `rules[3].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-012` | `product_intent`; `rules[6].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-013` | `rules[2].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-014` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-015` | `rules[1].provenance`; `rules[1].source`; `rules[6].must_prove` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-016` | `rules[4].provenance`; `rules[4].source`; `rules[5].must_prove`; `rules[7].must_prove`; new `BR-CAP-PFM-INT-016-09` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-017` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-018` | `product_intent`; `rules[3].must_prove`; `rules[5].must_prove`; `rules[5].provenance`; `rules[5].source`; new `BR-CAP-PFM-INT-018-07` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-019` | `status`; `product_intent`; `rules[3].must_prove`; `rules[7].must_prove`; new `BR-CAP-PFM-INT-019-10` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-020` | `product_intent` | All readable text rewritten |
| `CON-PFM-INT-001` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CON-PFM-INT-002` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CON-PFM-INT-003` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CON-PFM-INT-004` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CON-PFM-INT-005` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CON-PFM-INT-006` | `acted_on_by` | All readable text rewritten |
| `FEAT-PFM-INT-01` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `FEAT-PFM-INT-02` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `FEAT-PFM-INT-03` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `FEAT-PFM-INT-04` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `FEAT-PFM-INT-05` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `FEAT-PFM-INT-06` | `capabilities` | All readable text rewritten |
| `JNY-PFM-INT-001` | `implementation_evidence`; `steps[4].provenance`; `steps[4].source` | All readable text rewritten |
| `JNY-PFM-INT-002` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `JNY-PFM-INT-003` | `steps[3].provenance`; `steps[3].source` | All readable text rewritten |
| `JNY-PFM-INT-004` | `steps[3].source` | All readable text rewritten |
| `JNY-PFM-INT-005` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `JNY-PFM-INT-006` | No protected metadata change | All readable text rewritten |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-021` / `ATS-PFM-INT-021` | New allocations superseding the recipe portion of the combined predecessor | All readable text authored and separately committed |
| `CAP-PFM-INT-022` / `ATS-PFM-INT-022` | New allocations superseding the calendar portion of the combined predecessor | All readable text authored and separately committed |
| `ACT-PFM-017`–`ACT-PFM-006` | Principal, permission and surface values retained | Descriptions, goals and permitted activity wording rewritten |

## Findings left open

All findings remain visible for product or engineering resolution; this examination does not close a disagreement by describing its implementation. Newly recorded findings cover consent restoration, unsupported enforcement claims, incomplete proof, registration authority, the missing brief, unverified external wiring, workflow omissions, retry redelivery, mandatory proof gaps and browser recovery. The existing open questions retain their identifiers and now state recommendations in product language.

| Finding | Severity | Outstanding issue |
|---|---|---|
| `FND-PFM-INT-001` | medium | The initial module boundary omitted the Library, extension pages and module documentation while naming a redirect. Source coverage must use the actual screens and documented module paths. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-002` | medium | The overview describes narrower disconnection safeguards than the service implements: every current binding prevents retirement, unfinished accounts can be discarded, and a previously verified account can be disconnected after verification fails. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-003` | low | Implementation comments refer to an additional account-disconnection decision absent from the recorded milestone decision list. The observed exception remains unconfirmed. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-004` | medium | The separately declared execution-reading permission is unused by read routes. Granting that key alone does not authorize execution access, which uses the general integration-reading permission. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-005` | medium | The service health summary counts suspended accounts as requiring attention, but the Library queue excludes them. The recorded display decision represents suspension as grey, leaving the intended queue treatment unresolved. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-006` | high | Provider notifications, integration events and subscription deliveries have reachable implementations ahead of their proposed milestone. Their open product decisions prevent treating implementation as approved intent. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-007` | medium | OAuth setup, callbacks and refresh exist ahead of the proposed credential milestone. The test provider’s sign-in deployment and a recorded acceptance of this complete flow are absent from the examined evidence. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-008` | medium | Contract-major binding migration is implemented despite the call milestone explicitly deferring that outcome. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-009` | medium | The approved operator rate-limit adjustment has a persistence writer but no exposed route or caller in the examined module. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-010` | high | Extension pages use a local sample adapter rather than Platform services. They also expose customer event subscriptions removed by the recorded build decision. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-011` | medium | The extension build adopts design recommendations without a recorded Andrew ruling for each product decision. Its observed behaviour remains proposed pending an explicit approval record. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-012` | medium | The examined console has no connected pages for action recipes, business calendars, automation management or shared action runs and timers. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-013` | low | Automation configuration exists, but the examined boundary does not prove a consuming application’s event execution. The declared notification action remains disabled until its supporting product exists. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-014` | medium | Synchronization pages appear in the Library while synchronization profiles lack Platform support. The recorded installation walk reports a failure on this unfinished surface. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-015` | low | Data-grant routes validate requests and return an unimplemented result. Accepted data scopes therefore do not establish working data delivery, and that refusal is not an approved product outcome. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-016` | medium | Invocation records refer to captured payloads without an implemented storage write, and the extension module has no history-retention sweep. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-017` | low | Archived executions lack an expiry implementation. Payment-history retention duration remains an unresolved product decision. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-018` | medium | The short-window circuit threshold uses a local process counter rather than a shared account counter. Ephemeral execution weakens that threshold, and existing tests do not prove the complete circuit-opening behaviour. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-019` | low | Automated proof of version publication, deprecation and pinned-version retirement refusal is missing. Their staff screens belong to a proposed operational milestone. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-020` | low | Legacy acceptance personas name configuration permissions that Platform does not declare. Current integration permission declarations must govern role setup. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-021` | low | Uninstallation deletes subscriptions, whereas the recorded decision only says to stop them. Reinstallation does not recover those deleted definitions. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-022` | medium | The call milestone remains in progress, with recorded product defects in its examination runs. Built gateway behaviour is not equivalent to a completed product acceptance. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-023` | low | Legacy adapter acceptance entries include developer packages, provider implementations and consumer applications beyond this module boundary. Identifier absorption does not verify their behaviour. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-024` | low | Extension deployment registration logs its result but creates no product audit record of definitions changed, retired or orphaned. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-025` | high | The service allows previously withdrawn access to be restored within the current release declaration, while the approved decision describes access as narrowable only; version updates also check only newly introduced access rather than every unaccepted request. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-026` | medium | Several draft rows attribute whole-rule enforcement to the database where the permitted table declaration establishes only shape or uniqueness checks; the examination removes those claims and leaves database-trigger coverage outside this source boundary unverified. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-027` | medium | Some existing test bindings establish only part of their acceptance scenario; publication ordering, empty neutral values and circuit opening lack complete bound proof, and the unwired Extensions console cannot establish backend behaviour at browser level. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-028` | high | An admitted extension registration caller can name another application in its declaration; the intake checks ownership against that supplied name without authenticating it against the invoking application, so replacement can retire that application’s points and orphan its bindings. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-029` | low | The named planning brief is absent from the supplied corpus commit, so the examination cannot compare the layer with that brief’s discovery instructions or exclusions. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-030` | medium | Cross-application database grants, external host adoption and infrastructure deployment are outside the permitted source paths or are not executed in this examination; source declarations establish intended wiring rather than operational readiness. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-031` | low | Workflow configuration needs explicit calendar-limit, concurrency and lock refusals and deployment-refresh effects; the examination adds these obligations with proposed scenarios because no single existing binding proves each complete case. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-032` | medium | Event routing retries can deliver again to consumers that already handled an earlier attempt; the source supports at-least-once transport and consumer deduplication, rather than one total invocation per consumer. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-033` | medium | Additional refusals, calculations and record-changing effects are mandatory proof obligations; the listed rules need dedicated complete scenarios or stronger bindings before approval, even where neighbouring scenarios provide partial coverage. |
| `FND-PFM-INT-034` | high | The browser credential-recovery source records a missing wizard correction control and a conditional failure before replacement; it cannot prove the complete recovery journey, and browser call-detail and manual-completion assertions also need sources that establish the entire stated result. |

## Validation and landing scope

The required acceptance command, npm ci followed by npm run check, passes with zero conformance errors. The repository test command passes all four tests with zero failures. These checks validate corpus structure and its checker; they do not execute the source services’ integration suites or browser acceptance walks.

Authoring occurs on the requested task branch in the required worktree. Commits descend from the supplied starting commit. Changes are confined to this module, the module-added Platform actor descriptions and the module’s planning-status registry cell. No reader projection, workflow definition, provider code or shared development deployment is changed, and no commits are pushed.