---
title: Integrations testing back-fill and continuation examination
examined_at: '2026-10-23'
examiner: codex
source_sha:
  services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1
  macroservice-libraries: 54536a441935c6e09fdb7f96f0bec71c52ba4e03
  react-console: baf6dae382d6f41dce976c7f848667ccc37e076f
branch: agent/platform-integrations-test-exam-2
counts:
  specifications_extended: 22
  existing_scenarios: 178
  scenarios_added_by_category:
    transition: 17
    interaction: 54
    concurrency: 1
  scenarios_added: 72
  feature_suites_written: 6
  feature_scenarios: 30
  executable_suites_registered: 640
  bindings_made: 281
  capability_scenarios_bound: 162
  feature_scenarios_bound: 0
  coverage_gap_findings: 59
  category_gaps: 72
  nonexecutable_shells_excluded: 69
  contradictions_corrected: 2
method:
  binding_verification: >-
    Existing binding files and exact test titles are checked at source_sha; no executable suite is run by
    this documentation job.
  suite_unit: >-
    One artifact per executable test file in the scoped integration and lifecycle suites, shared-library
    unit suites and supporting unit files already cited by detailed scenarios.
  designed_coverage: 'Covered means a designed scenario exists, not that all its clauses execute or pass.'
  excluded: >-
    Files with only unavailable harness steps and no direct product assertions are recorded as coverage
    gaps.
  invariant_audit: >-
    Independent domain-object invariant obligations are enumerated in findings; state-transition cases do
    not claim blanket invariant coverage.
requested_report: reports/TESTING-BACKFILL-2026-10-23.md
remaining_authoring_work: []
continuation:
  pass: 2
  corpus_start_sha: b9480832382f675bea003ce68c2eb36a2ae8354b
  previous_openai_commits:
    - b8b811dc8aa0a57dcb2cc7a41a24d26d8e4f125f
    - d876ca064d6ad337d3f120f2c862cd059a03d54d
  artifacts_examined: 668
  capability_specification_bodies_rewritten: 22
  feature_suite_bodies_rewritten: 6
  executable_suite_registrations_retained_after_audit: 640
  bound_scenarios_with_explicit_contribution_scope: 162
  scenarios_added: 0
  feature_suites_added: 0
  executable_suites_added: 0
  bindings_added: 0
  new_findings: [FND-PFM-INT-112]
  resolved_findings: [FND-PFM-INT-111]
  source_audit:
    registered_files: 640
    test_case_anchors: 2645
    missing_registered_files: 0
    missing_test_case_titles: 0
    duplicate_registered_files: 0
    nonreciprocal_bindings: 0
    additional_unregistered_executable_files: 0
    acceptance_shells_retained_as_gaps: 69
  obligation_audit:
    must_prove_rules: 200
    rules_with_designed_scenarios: 182
    rules_without_scenarios_recorded_in_findings: 18
    modeled_transitions: 152
    transitions_in_proposed_case_matrices: 152
    related_capability_links_without_interaction_scenarios: 0
    object_invariants: 57
    object_invariants_without_direct_scenario_references: 56
    category_gaps: 72
    unbound_capability_scenarios: 88
    unbound_feature_scenarios: 30
  open_findings:
    coverage: FND-PFM-INT-052 through FND-PFM-INT-110
    identity_collision: FND-PFM-INT-112
  evidence:
    - 'rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/integrations/ID_REGISTRY.md'
    - 'rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/integrations/FINDINGS.md:testing_coverage_evidence'
    - 'rhythm-v2-docs:tools/check-corpus.mjs:report filename recognition'
    - 'services-platform:modules/integrations/tests, modules/extensions/tests, modules/workflow-actions/tests at source_sha'
    - 'macroservice-libraries:packages/integration-contracts, packages/extensions, packages/workflow-actions at source_sha'
    - 'react-console:acceptance/integrations and the registered source files at source_sha'
validation:
  corpus_check: 'passed: zero errors, 7976 existing corpus warnings'
  corpus_tests: 'passed: seven tests, zero failures'
  binding_audit: 'passed: every suite binding is reciprocal and every retained test title exists at the pinned revision'
  product_suite_execution: not-run
  acceptance_commands:
    - npm ci && npm run check
    - npm test
---
# Integrations Testing Back-Fill

## Counts

The first pass established the testing inventory shown below. The continuation preserves its identifiers, scenario definitions and bindings; the new examination changes proof-boundary wording and resolves the report-name requirement.

| Measure | Existing corpus total | Added in pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capability test specifications | 22 | 0 |
| Capability scenarios | 250 | 0 |
| Feature acceptance suites | 6 | 0 |
| Feature scenarios | 30 | 0 |
| Executable suite registrations | 640 | 0 |
| Scenario-to-suite bindings | 281 | 0 |
| Bound capability scenarios | 162 | 0 |
| Bound feature scenarios | 0 | 0 |
| Coverage-gap findings | 59 | 0 |
| Category gaps | 72 | 0 |
| Excluded acceptance shells | 69 | 0 |

The first pass added seventeen transition scenarios, fifty-four interaction scenarios and one concurrency scenario. No other category gained scenarios in that pass, and this continuation adds no scenarios.

## Continuation (pass 2)

All twenty-two capability specifications have a ten-category coverage map and categorized scenarios. All six features have an acceptance suite and a matching acceptance reference. The source inventory accounts for the scoped service and shared-library suites; the sixty-nine unregistered acceptance shells are already enumerated in the coverage finding.

The examination checks every registered file and every retained test-case title at the pinned commits, verifies reciprocal bindings, compares the proposed transition matrices with the state models and checks each declared related-capability link for an interaction scenario. It also checks required-rule and object-invariant omissions against the existing findings. These are source and corpus checks; no product suite executes in this documentation pass.

The continuation rewrites the explanatory sections of all capability specifications and feature suites. Every bound capability scenario now states that its tests contribute only their asserted outcomes; additional branches and composed sequences remain proposed. The executable registrations retain the previous OpenAI text and their unexecuted, unverified result values after the inventory and anchor audit.

The requested back-fill report name is accepted by the checker at the starting corpus commit. The report moves to that name, and the module’s report references follow it. A new finding records conflicting historical finding allocations; every existing identifier remains unchanged and the registry now names the next unused finding number.

## Remaining Findings

Eighteen required rules lack a designed scenario and are explicitly listed in coverage findings. Seventy-two category gaps, eighty-eight unbound capability scenarios and all thirty unbound feature compositions also remain findings. Fifty-six object invariants lack a direct scenario reference, and their independent proof obligations remain recorded rather than being inferred from transition coverage.

Some registered browser suites contain unavailable or conditional steps. Their registration and partial assertions cannot establish complete feature acceptance. The conflicting historical finding allocations need Andrew’s disposition; the current checker passes despite that semantic collision.

No authoring item from the previous report remains unrecorded. The remaining work is the proof and product disposition identified by the findings, not an omitted suite, binding or report.

## Verdict for Andrew

The testing corpus now gives a traceable source-level account of the module at the pinned commits, and every remaining examination obligation is either documented or recorded as a finding. Its weakest evidence is executable proof of composed feature flows, uncovered rule and invariant obligations, and browser steps that depend on unavailable harness support. Before qualification, resolve the finding-identifier collision, decide the open product boundaries and implement and run the missing proof without treating source observations as approval.