--- id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001 scope: CAP-PFM-TNL-001 product_area: platform module: tenant-lifecycle revision: 3 status: proposed approved_by: null approved_at: null source_sha: services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1 services-crm: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69 services-commerce: c8b66a98e2490617aec38ba5c8165dd9bd0a8f9b services-committees: 36129c24daeaadcdb339218c38cdeaff9861359d services-membership: 5994c270e8a37a30f848e99ba5b5ee6b87c08893 services-submissions: 64236c19be89579ef5897aad7de3925ed3ce03bf services-websites: 5fc6823c69d5e6f208c21dba8c0eb3132f8bdc4c services-marketing: d071a159fe9782bb71ff246d5c67d5bbfe07fbfa rhythm-v2-docs: d318a948692343e2f0a7ecc2e11c50db179a8c95 scenarios: - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-01 title: Customer authority cannot provision level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-01 preconditions: A working workspace has a customer administrator. steps: Submit a creation request with that identity. expected: The request is refused without recording a workspace or build job. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#may not ask for a tenant at all - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant exactly as it was after all of those refusals - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#refuses an anonymous call as 401 - TST-PFM-TNL-056 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#may not ask for a tenant at all category: permission action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#may not ask for a tenant at all assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#may not ask for a tenant at all binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-02 title: Identifiers are validated and normalized level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-02 preconditions: 'Creation requests exercise missing, generated-looking, reserved and mixed-case identifiers.' steps: Submit each identifier variant. expected: Invalid variants identify the rejected field; valid mixed-case input is stored lowercase. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses a create that names no id as 400 tenant_id_required, naming id - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses a UUID-shaped id as 400 tenant_id_invalid, nothing generating ids any more - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses a reserved id as 400 tenant_id_reserved - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#stores an id normalized, trimmed and lowercase - TST-PFM-TNL-057 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses a create that names no id as 400 tenant_id_required, naming id category: validation action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses a create that names no id as 400 tenant_id_required, naming id assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses a create that names no id as 400 tenant_id_required, naming id binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-03 title: Submission replay retains identity level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-03 preconditions: The original submission has been accepted. steps: Resubmit its identical payload and submission identity. expected: Both responses refer to one workspace and one build job. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the same tenant and the same job when the same submission is sent twice - TST-PFM-TNL-082 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the same tenant and the same job when the same submission is sent twice category: invariant action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the same tenant and the same job when the same submission is sent twice assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the same tenant and the same job when the same submission is sent twice binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-04 title: Identifier collision preserves the original level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-04 preconditions: A workspace already holds the chosen identifier. steps: Submit a new request with that identifier. expected: Creation reports the collision without modifying the existing record. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses a different submission that names a tenant id somebody already has - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses an id another tenant has as 409 tenant_id_taken provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses a different submission that names a tenant id somebody already has category: validation action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses a different submission that names a tenant id somebody already has assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses a different submission that names a tenant id somebody already has binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-05 title: Sender refusal rolls back creation level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-05 preconditions: A request includes an invalid sender choice. steps: Submit the whole workspace request. expected: 'The refusal retains no new customer, workspace, job or provider resource.' negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-email-strategy.integration.spec.js#creates no tenant at all when the strategy is refused: the request is rejected whole - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-email-strategy.integration.spec.js#creates nothing in SES when the strategy is refused - TST-PFM-TNL-085 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-email-strategy.integration.spec.js#creates no tenant at all when the strategy is refused: the request is rejected whole category: invariant action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-email-strategy.integration.spec.js#creates no tenant at all when the strategy is refused: the request is rejected whole assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-email-strategy.integration.spec.js#creates no tenant at all when the strategy is refused: the request is rejected whole binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-06 title: Request acceptance precedes readiness level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-06 preconditions: A new workspace request is ready to submit. steps: Inspect the returned workspace before and after running its build. expected: It begins provisioning and becomes active with a recorded opening time. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers a tenant that is not usable yet, because the work has only been asked for - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant usable once the job has run - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#records when the tenant became usable - TST-PFM-TNL-056 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers a tenant that is not usable yet, because the work has only been asked for category: transition action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers a tenant that is not usable yet, because the work has only been asked for assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers a tenant that is not usable yet, because the work has only been asked for binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-07 title: Execution-start failure preserves the request level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-07 preconditions: The job starter is configured to fail. steps: Submit the provisioning request. expected: The response returns the committed workspace and pending job without an execution handle. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the tenant it created and the job it submitted, as a successful request does - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#leaves the job pending and without a handle, which is what the reconciler settles - TST-PFM-TNL-082 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the tenant it created and the job it submitted, as a successful request does category: failure action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the tenant it created and the job it submitted, as a successful request does assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the tenant it created and the job it submitted, as a successful request does binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-08 title: Provisioning distinguishes inherited and explicitly cleared company links category: rule level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-10 preconditions: The existing customer has a commercial company link; the provisioning caller is authorized staff. steps: >- Create one workspace without a company field, another with an explicit company and a third with an explicitly cleared company. expected: >- The three workspaces respectively inherit the customer company, use the supplied company and retain no company link. negative: false data_needs: Use separate run-owned target and comparison workspace records created by the cited suite. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#takes the customer\u2019s company when the request says nothing about one - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#stores the company the request names, in place of the customer\u2019s - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#links a tenant to no company when the request says so explicitly, though the customer has one - TST-PFM-TNL-086 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#takes the customer\u2019s company when the request says nothing about one; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#stores the company the request names, in place of the customer\u2019s; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#links a tenant to no company when the request says so explicitly, though the customer has one action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#takes the customer\u2019s company when the request says nothing about one; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#stores the company the request names, in place of the customer\u2019s; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#links a tenant to no company when the request says so explicitly, though the customer has one assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#takes the customer\u2019s company when the request says nothing about one; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#stores the company the request names, in place of the customer\u2019s; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#links a tenant to no company when the request says so explicitly, though the customer has one binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-001-09 title: Accepted construction changes access only after readiness category: interaction level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-06 interacts_with: - CAP-PFM-TNL-002 - CAP-PFM-TNL-003 - CAP-PFM-TNL-005 preconditions: A new customer workspace is requested and one remote readiness check reports a missing resource. steps: >- Submit the request, run construction through the failing readiness check, inspect ordinary access, repair the resource and retry. expected: >- The accepted identity remains the same; access stays closed on failure and opens only after the repaired attempt succeeds. negative: true data_needs: >- Create a separate run-owned workspace for each decision branch and an unaffected comparison workspace. Use a controlled clock, paused task or injected fault at the boundary named in the scenario. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-002-open-a-new-workspace-only-when-every-application-reports-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-005-keep-people-and-background-work-out-of-a-workspace-that-is.md action_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-002-open-a-new-workspace-only-when-every-application-reports-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-005-keep-people-and-background-work-out-of-a-workspace-that-is.md assertion_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-002-open-a-new-workspace-only-when-every-application-reports-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-005-keep-people-and-background-work-out-of-a-workspace-that-is.md evidence: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#may not ask for a tenant at all - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#refuses a create that names no id as 400 tenant_id_required, naming id - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the same tenant and the same job when the same submission is sent twice - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses a different submission that names a tenant id somebody already has - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-email-strategy.integration.spec.js#creates no tenant at all when the strategy is refused: the request is rejected whole - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers a tenant that is not usable yet, because the work has only been asked for - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#answers the tenant it created and the job it submitted, as a successful request does - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#takes the customer\u2019s company when the request says nothing about one; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#stores the company the request names, in place of the customer\u2019s; services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/tenant-hubspot-link.integration.spec.js#links a tenant to no company when the request says so explicitly, though the customer has one - >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-002-open-a-new-workspace-only-when-every-application-reports-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-005-keep-people-and-background-work-out-of-a-workspace-that-is.md coverage: rule: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' transition: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' validation: covered permission: covered edge: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' failure: covered boundary: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' concurrency: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' invariant: covered interaction: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' coverage_notes: transition: >- The listed scenarios sample lifecycle changes. Complete transition, guard and side-effect proof is still owed for the state models named in the coverage finding. interaction: >- The added interaction is proposed. Related capabilities not included in that scenario remain named in the coverage finding. transition_obligations: - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 1 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateProvisionedTenant' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 2 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-failure.ts:applyTenantProvisioningFailure - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 3 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/submit-tenant-provisioning.ts:retryTenantProvisioning - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 4 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 5 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:enterTenantLoading' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 6 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 7 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateLoadedTenant' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 8 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/lifecycle/lifecycle-transitions.ts:SUCCESSORS' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 9 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:cancelTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 10 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/begin-destruction.ts:beginTenantDestruction' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 11 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:forceTenantDeletingAfterRestore' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 1 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-operations.ts:tenantProvisioningOperations - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 2 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: documented source: 'services-platform:docs/jobs.md#ยง2 step 8' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 3 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-operations.ts:tenantProvisioningOperations - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 4 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-workflow.ts:tenantProvisioningWorkflow permission_obligations: - key: hq.tenants.provision where_checked: api scenario_examples: - ATS-PFM-TNL-001-01 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-066' note: 'Examples do not establish the complete key-by-key grant, revoked-grant and staff-context matrix.' provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md evidence_note: >- The test-specific convention lists an Evidence body section, but the corpus checker rejects it. Sources and verification limits remain in frontmatter so this artifact conforms without changing the checker. --- # Request a complete customer workspace: Capability Test Specification ## Coverage The category map separates defined scenarios from missing proof. A covered category has a scenario; a binding records inspected test assertions and carries no execution result. State-model completeness and untested interactions remain explicit gaps. | Rule | Proved by | |---|---| | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-01` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-01` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-02` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-02` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-03` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-03` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-04` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-04` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-05` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-05` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-06` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-06`, `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-09` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-07` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-07` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-08` | No scenario: `FND-PFM-TNL-066` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-001-10` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-08` | ## Interactions With Related Capabilities Accepted construction changes access only after readiness. The combined scenario sets up the stated boundary, changes the upstream condition and observes its effect on the dependent outcome. Its steps and assertions are proposed; component tests do not establish this combined execution. | Related capability | Combined coverage | |---|---| | `CAP-PFM-TNL-002` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-09` (proposed) | | `CAP-PFM-TNL-003` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-001-09` (proposed) | | `CAP-PFM-TNL-004` | Gap: `FND-PFM-TNL-066` | | `CAP-PFM-TNL-018` | Gap: `FND-PFM-TNL-066` |