--- id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003 scope: CAP-PFM-TNL-003 product_area: platform module: tenant-lifecycle revision: 1 status: proposed approved_by: null approved_at: null source_sha: services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1 services-crm: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69 services-commerce: c8b66a98e2490617aec38ba5c8165dd9bd0a8f9b services-committees: 36129c24daeaadcdb339218c38cdeaff9861359d services-membership: 5994c270e8a37a30f848e99ba5b5ee6b87c08893 services-submissions: 64236c19be89579ef5897aad7de3925ed3ce03bf services-websites: 5fc6823c69d5e6f208c21dba8c0eb3132f8bdc4c services-marketing: d071a159fe9782bb71ff246d5c67d5bbfe07fbfa rhythm-v2-docs: d318a948692343e2f0a7ecc2e11c50db179a8c95 scenarios: - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-01 title: Snapshots distinguish authorized and absent reads level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-01 preconditions: Fixtures include a requested workspace and one without a provisioning job. steps: 'Read as staff and customer administrator, then inspect the no-job fixture.' expected: Staff obtain named steps; customer authority is refused and the no-job read returns not found. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#shows every step completed, and names each one for the person reading it - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#may not watch the provisioning of their own tenant - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers 404 for a tenant that was never provisioned by a request - TST-PFM-TNL-056 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#shows every step completed, and names each one for the person reading it category: permission action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#shows every step completed, and names each one for the person reading it assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#shows every step completed, and names each one for the person reading it binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-02 title: Failed construction retains partial resources level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-02 preconditions: A participant refuses its construction step. steps: Run the job and inspect its workspace and snapshot. expected: The workspace remains provisioning failed with the recorded refusal summary. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#says so in the snapshot too, with the failure summary the task refused with - TST-PFM-TNL-056 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable category: failure action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-03 title: Recovery is limited to failed builds level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-03 preconditions: One build failed and another succeeded. steps: Request retry for each workspace. expected: The failed build gets a new attempt and can open; the successful build rejects retry. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers 200 and a new job to the retry - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant usable after the retry - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#refuses to provision a tenant again whose provisioning did not fail - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#may not provision their own tenant again - TST-PFM-TNL-056 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers 200 and a new job to the retry category: transition action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers 200 and a new job to the retry assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers 200 and a new job to the retry binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-04 title: Outcome handling avoids normal replay level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-04 preconditions: Success and failure fixtures include requester notices. steps: Repeat closing tasks and failure reconciliation. expected: The delivered fixture notice is retained without another send. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends nothing a second time when the activate task runs again - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#repeats the failure summary the job recorded, so the requester reads why - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends nothing more when the reconciler applies the same consequence afterwards - TST-PFM-TNL-083 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message category: edge action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-05 title: Alerts accompany requester mail level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-06 preconditions: A successful build has an operations-channel fixture. steps: Inspect the alert and captured requester message. expected: Both channels identify the workspace and job outcome. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning-alerts.e2e.spec.js#posts “Tenant ready” to the operations channel, with the message ts as the delivery’s provider reference - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning-alerts.e2e.spec.js#tells the requester by e-mail as well: the alert is beside the notice, not instead of it - TST-PFM-TNL-055 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning-alerts.e2e.spec.js#posts “Tenant ready” to the operations channel, with the message ts as the delivery’s provider reference category: rule action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning-alerts.e2e.spec.js#posts “Tenant ready” to the operations channel, with the message ts as the delivery’s provider reference assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning-alerts.e2e.spec.js#posts “Tenant ready” to the operations channel, with the message ts as the delivery’s provider reference binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-06 title: Stranded repair is repeatable level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-07 preconditions: One workspace has a settled unstarted job and another a running job. steps: Run repair twice. expected: >- Only the stranded workspace becomes failed; its notice is handled once and the running workspace remains intact. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#moves the stranded tenant to provisioning_failed, which makes it retryable and deletable again - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#tells the staff member who asked for the tenant once, with the job’s own summary - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#leaves a tenant whose provisioning is still running provisioning - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#changes nothing about the repaired tenant on a second pass - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/lifecycle/reconciled-job-failure.integration.spec.js#moves the tenant to provisioning_failed, which is what makes it retryable and deletable again provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#moves the stranded tenant to provisioning_failed, which makes it retryable and deletable again category: invariant action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#moves the stranded tenant to provisioning_failed, which makes it retryable and deletable again assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#moves the stranded tenant to provisioning_failed, which makes it retryable and deletable again binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-07 title: Ready mail links the requester to progress level: api proves: - AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-001-03 preconditions: The successful provisioning journey captures requester mail. steps: Inspect the captured message and repeat outcome handling. expected: A single handled ready message includes the job link. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#links to the job’s own page in Rhythm HQ, so the requester can read the steps - TST-PFM-TNL-083 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message category: rule action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-08 title: Failure explanation supports staff recovery level: api proves: - AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-002-01 preconditions: The recovery journey has a refused build. steps: Inspect its retained workspace and job snapshot. expected: The failed workspace and explanation remain available without removal of completed construction. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#says so in the snapshot too, with the failure summary the task refused with - TST-PFM-TNL-056 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable category: rule action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-09 title: Recovery opens without duplicate construction level: api proves: - AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-002-02 preconditions: The recovery journey retains completed steps from its failed attempt. steps: Run retry through activation. expected: The workspace opens and already completed participant work is not repeated. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#does the missing work and not the finished work when it is provisioned again - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant usable after the retry provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#does the missing work and not the finished work when it is provisioned again category: interaction action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#does the missing work and not the finished work when it is provisioned again assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#does the missing work and not the finished work when it is provisioned again binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-003-10 title: An unwanted failed build enters deliberate deletion category: interaction level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-08 interacts_with: - CAP-PFM-TNL-013 - CAP-PFM-TNL-001 preconditions: A retained failed build contains completed participant work and is eligible for staff deletion. steps: 'Inspect its failed snapshot, request deletion and read the resulting request and workspace standing.' expected: >- The failed build remains available for review until deletion is requested; the request creates a separate decision and the shorter unopened-workspace wait. negative: true data_needs: >- Create a separate run-owned workspace for each decision branch and an unaffected comparison workspace. Use a controlled clock, paused task or injected fault at the boundary named in the scenario. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-013-ask-for-a-workspace-to-be-deleted-after-a-waiting-period.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md action_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-013-ask-for-a-workspace-to-be-deleted-after-a-waiting-period.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md assertion_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-013-ask-for-a-workspace-to-be-deleted-after-a-waiting-period.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md evidence: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#shows every step completed, and names each one for the person reading it - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant saying its provisioning failed, which is what makes it retryable - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning.e2e.spec.js#answers 200 and a new job to the retry - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provisioning-notices.integration.spec.js#sends the requester one message - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-provisioning-alerts.e2e.spec.js#posts “Tenant ready” to the operations channel, with the message ts as the delivery’s provider reference - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/repair-stranded-provisioning.integration.spec.js#moves the stranded tenant to provisioning_failed, which makes it retryable and deletable again - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/provisioning/provision-tenant.integration.spec.js#does the missing work and not the finished work when it is provisioned again - >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-013-ask-for-a-workspace-to-be-deleted-after-a-waiting-period.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md coverage: rule: covered transition: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' validation: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' permission: covered edge: covered failure: covered boundary: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' concurrency: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' invariant: covered interaction: covered coverage_notes: transition: >- The listed scenarios sample lifecycle changes. Complete transition, guard and side-effect proof is still owed for the state models named in the coverage finding. interaction: >- The added interaction is proposed. Related capabilities not included in that scenario remain named in the coverage finding. transition_obligations: - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 1 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateProvisionedTenant' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 2 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-failure.ts:applyTenantProvisioningFailure - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 3 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/submit-tenant-provisioning.ts:retryTenantProvisioning - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 4 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 5 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:enterTenantLoading' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 6 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 7 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateLoadedTenant' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 8 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/lifecycle/lifecycle-transitions.ts:SUCCESSORS' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 9 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:cancelTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 10 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/begin-destruction.ts:beginTenantDestruction' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 11 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:forceTenantDeletingAfterRestore' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 1 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-operations.ts:tenantProvisioningOperations - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 2 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: documented source: 'services-platform:docs/jobs.md#§2 step 8' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 3 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-operations.ts:tenantProvisioningOperations - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-002 transition_n: 4 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-workflow.ts:tenantProvisioningWorkflow permission_obligations: - key: hq.tenants.read where_checked: api scenario_examples: - ATS-PFM-TNL-003-01 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' note: 'Examples do not establish the complete key-by-key grant, revoked-grant and staff-context matrix.' provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md - key: hq.tenants.provision where_checked: api scenario_examples: - ATS-PFM-TNL-003-01 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-068' note: 'Examples do not establish the complete key-by-key grant, revoked-grant and staff-context matrix.' provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-003-follow-a-provisioning-retry-it-and-hear-how-it-ended.md evidence_note: >- The test-specific convention lists an Evidence body section, but the corpus checker rejects it. Sources and verification limits remain in frontmatter so this artifact conforms without changing the checker. --- # Understand and recover a workspace build: Capability Test Specification ## Coverage The category map separates defined scenarios from missing proof. A covered category has a scenario; a binding records inspected test assertions and carries no execution result. State-model completeness and untested interactions remain explicit gaps. | Rule | Proved by | |---|---| | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-01` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-01` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-02` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-02` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-03` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-03` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-04` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-04` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-06` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-05` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-003-07` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-06` | ## Interactions With Related Capabilities An unwanted failed build enters deliberate deletion. The combined scenario sets up the stated boundary, changes the upstream condition and observes its effect on the dependent outcome. Its steps and assertions are proposed; component tests do not establish this combined execution. | Related capability | Combined coverage | |---|---| | `CAP-PFM-TNL-001` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-10` (proposed) | | `CAP-PFM-TNL-013` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-003-10` (proposed) |