---
id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012
scope: CAP-PFM-TNL-012
product_area: platform
module: tenant-lifecycle
revision: 3
status: proposed
approved_by: null
approved_at: null
source_sha:
  services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1
  services-crm: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69
  services-commerce: c8b66a98e2490617aec38ba5c8165dd9bd0a8f9b
  services-committees: 36129c24daeaadcdb339218c38cdeaff9861359d
  services-membership: 5994c270e8a37a30f848e99ba5b5ee6b87c08893
  services-submissions: 64236c19be89579ef5897aad7de3925ed3ce03bf
  services-websites: 5fc6823c69d5e6f208c21dba8c0eb3132f8bdc4c
  services-marketing: d071a159fe9782bb71ff246d5c67d5bbfe07fbfa
  rhythm-v2-docs: d318a948692343e2f0a7ecc2e11c50db179a8c95
scenarios:
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-01
    title: Reset rejects non-import callers
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-01
    preconditions: The workspace is loading.
    steps: 'Request reset using activation-only, customer and anonymous identities.'
    expected: Each refusal leaves selected records intact.
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses the staff member who
        may only activate a tenant, resetting being part of running the import
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses an administrator of
        the tenant’s own customer
      - 'services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses an anonymous caller'
      - TST-PFM-TNL-049
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses the staff member who
      may only activate a tenant, resetting being part of running the import
    category: permission
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses the staff member who
        may only activate a tenant, resetting being part of running the import
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses the staff member who
        may only activate a tenant, resetting being part of running the import
    binding_note: >-
      All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected
      executable source rather than a passing run.
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-02
    title: Reset checks both eligibility axes
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-02
    preconditions: Fixtures include live mode and an implementation workspace outside loading.
    steps: Request reset in each fixture.
    expected: 'Neither records a reset job or removes data, and each identifies its invalid axis.'
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a tenant that is not loading, naming that half of the rule
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a live tenant, naming the other half
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#records
        no reset job for any tenant it refused
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses a tenant that is in
        implementation mode and not loading
      - >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a live tenant, whatever its lifecycle state
      - >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#refuses
        an implementation tenant that is no longer loading
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
      a tenant that is not loading, naming that half of the rule
    category: validation
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a tenant that is not loading, naming that half of the rule
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a tenant that is not loading, naming that half of the rule
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-03
    title: Reset confirmation rejects missing and wrong text
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-03
    preconditions: A workspace is eligible for reset.
    steps: Omit confirmation and supply incorrect confirmation.
    expected: Both requests refuse without removal.
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a confirmation that is not the tenant’s id, and does not say what to type
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a missing confirmation
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses a confirmation that
        is not the tenant’s own id, without saying what to type
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
      a confirmation that is not the tenant’s id, and does not say what to type
    category: validation
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a confirmation that is not the tenant’s id, and does not say what to type
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        a confirmation that is not the tenant’s id, and does not say what to type
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-04
    title: Open reset prevents a competing request
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-04
    preconditions: The first reset is pending or running.
    steps: Submit another reset request.
    expected: The refusal identifies the first job and creates no competing run.
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        the second request as a conflict, naming the job that is running
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        before it asks any participant anything
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses the second 409,
        naming the reset that is running
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
      the second request as a conflict, naming the job that is running
    category: concurrency
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        the second request as a conflict, naming the job that is running
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        the second request as a conflict, naming the job that is running
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-05
    title: Unsupported application prevents partial reset
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-05
    preconditions: A required application has no declared reset support.
    steps: Request reset.
    expected: Planning refuses with the application identified and no job or removal recorded.
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        the reset, naming the service and the contract it has to implement
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#removes
        nothing at all: a half-reset tenant is the outcome worth refusing for
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses a tenant it may
        otherwise reset, the services holding its records not being in the live plan
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
      the reset, naming the service and the contract it has to implement
    category: validation
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        the reset, naming the service and the contract it has to implement
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
        the reset, naming the service and the contract it has to implement
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-06
    title: Reset follows removed-and-kept classification
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-06
    preconditions: Selected and kept participants have populated workspace records.
    steps: Run reset and inspect their inventories.
    expected: >-
      Selected data is emptied according to application classification and kept participants retain their
      rows.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#empties
        every table of every participant it empties, but the configuration a participant’s own reset keeps
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#keeps
        every table of every participant it does not empty, row for row
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#keeps
        the tenant row itself, which is the whole point of a reset
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/unit/services/lifecycle/reset-participants.spec.js#accounts
        for every participant, emptied or kept
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/unit/services/lifecycle/reset-participants.spec.js#keeps the
        security participant, so the tenant’s people and their grants survive it
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#empties
      every table of every participant it empties, but the configuration a participant’s own reset keeps
    category: rule
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#empties
        every table of every participant it empties, but the configuration a participant’s own reset keeps
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#empties
        every table of every participant it empties, but the configuration a participant’s own reset keeps
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-07
    title: CRM reset restores the seeded baseline
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-07
    preconditions: CRM’s loaded records differ from their provisioned baseline.
    steps: Reset its participants.
    expected: CRM defaults and seed ledger match the freshly provisioned comparison fixture.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
        the tenant holding exactly what a freshly provisioned tenant holds, table for table
      - >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
        the seeded records themselves equal to the freshly provisioned tenant’s
      - >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
        the seed ledger equal to the freshly provisioned tenant’s, seed for seed
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#let
        the other macroservice re-apply its seeds, which is what a reset has and a purge has not
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
      the tenant holding exactly what a freshly provisioned tenant holds, table for table
    category: invariant
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
        the tenant holding exactly what a freshly provisioned tenant holds, table for table
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
        the tenant holding exactly what a freshly provisioned tenant holds, table for table
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-08
    title: Reset progress leaves loading open
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-08
    preconditions: A loading workspace is eligible for reset.
    steps: Start and follow its job to completion.
    expected: >-
      The response supplies a job and progress reports removals while loading remains active as a lifecycle
      period.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#is accepted for a staff
        member holding hq.data-runs.manage: 202, naming the tenant and the job that empties it
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#answers the totals by
        resource the reset removed, the other macroservice’s among them
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#reports
        one progress event per participant, naming what that participant removed
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant loading
        and in implementation, so the package can be loaded again at once
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#is accepted for a staff member
      holding hq.data-runs.manage: 202, naming the tenant and the job that empties it
    category: transition
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#is accepted for a staff
        member holding hq.data-runs.manage: 202, naming the tenant and the job that empties it
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#is accepted for a staff
        member holding hq.data-runs.manage: 202, naming the tenant and the job that empties it
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-09
    title: Fresh reset finishes interrupted removal
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-09
    preconditions: The previous reset stopped part way and has settled.
    steps: Submit another reset.
    expected: It succeeds after removing the remaining selected records.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#accepts
        a second reset once the first has settled, and the second succeeds
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#finds
        nothing left to remove of the participants the first reset had already emptied
      - TST-PFM-TNL-087
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#accepts
      a second reset once the first has settled, and the second succeeds
    category: failure
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#accepts
        a second reset once the first has settled, and the second succeeds
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#accepts
        a second reset once the first has settled, and the second succeeds
    binding_note: >-
      All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected
      executable source rather than a passing run.
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-10
    title: Import recovery retains classified setup
    level: api
    proves:
      - AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-003-01
    preconditions: The import journey includes a reset and kept-participant fixtures.
    steps: Run reset and inspect retained setup and lifecycle.
    expected: Kept participants are unchanged and the workspace remains loading in implementation.
    negative: false
    data_needs: >-
      Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock
      seams only where declared.
    bound_to:
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant loading
        and in implementation, so the package can be loaded again at once
      - >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#keeps
        every table of every participant it does not empty, row for row
      - >-
        services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
        the tenant holding exactly what a freshly provisioned tenant holds, table for table
    provenance: test
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant loading and
      in implementation, so the package can be loaded again at once
    category: interaction
    action_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant loading
        and in implementation, so the package can be loaded again at once
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: test
      source: >-
        services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant loading
        and in implementation, so the package can be loaded again at once
    binding_note: >-
      The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives
      an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains
      FND-PFM-TNL-084.
    binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084
  - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-012-11
    title: Reset reapplication uses the baseline ledger
    category: interaction
    level: api
    proves:
      - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-07
    interacts_with:
      - CAP-PFM-TNL-008
      - CAP-PFM-TNL-017
    preconditions: A CRM load has imported rows alongside seeded defaults and an unrelated comparison workspace.
    steps: >-
      Run reset through removal and reseeding, inspect seed entries and default rows, and initialize the reset
      workspace once more.
    expected: >-
      The restored baseline is ledgered; initialization adds no duplicate and the comparison workspace remains
      unchanged.
    negative: true
    data_needs: >-
      Create a separate run-owned workspace for each decision branch and an unaffected comparison workspace.
      Use a controlled clock, paused task or injected fault at the boundary named in the scenario.
    bound_to: []
    provenance: proposed
    source: >-
      rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md;
      rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-008-give-every-workspace-its-default-configuration-exactly-once.md;
      rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md
    action_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source: >-
        rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md;
        rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-008-give-every-workspace-its-default-configuration-exactly-once.md;
        rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md
    assertion_evidence:
      provenance: proposed
      source: >-
        rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md;
        rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-008-give-every-workspace-its-default-configuration-exactly-once.md;
        rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md
evidence:
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#refuses the staff member who may
    only activate a tenant, resetting being part of running the import
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
    a tenant that is not loading, naming that half of the rule
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
    a confirmation that is not the tenant’s id, and does not say what to type
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
    the second request as a conflict, naming the job that is running
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#refuses
    the reset, naming the service and the contract it has to implement
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#empties
    every table of every participant it empties, but the configuration a participant’s own reset keeps
  - >-
    services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/reset.integration.spec.js#leaves
    the tenant holding exactly what a freshly provisioned tenant holds, table for table
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#is accepted for a staff member
    holding hq.data-runs.manage: 202, naming the tenant and the job that empties it
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/reset/reset-tenant.integration.spec.js#accepts
    a second reset once the first has settled, and the second succeeds
  - >-
    services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/hq-tenant-loading.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant loading and in
    implementation, so the package can be loaded again at once
  - >-
    rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md;
    rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-008-give-every-workspace-its-default-configuration-exactly-once.md;
    rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md
coverage:
  rule: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
  transition: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
  validation: covered
  permission: covered
  edge: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
  failure: covered
  boundary: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
  concurrency: covered
  invariant: covered
  interaction: covered
coverage_notes:
  transition: >-
    The listed scenarios sample lifecycle changes. Complete transition, guard and side-effect proof is still
    owed for the state models named in the coverage finding.
  interaction: >-
    The added interaction is proposed. Related capabilities not included in that scenario remain named in the
    coverage finding.
transition_obligations:
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 1
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateProvisionedTenant'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 2
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-failure.ts:applyTenantProvisioningFailure
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 3
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/submit-tenant-provisioning.ts:retryTenantProvisioning
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 4
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 5
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:enterTenantLoading'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 6
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 7
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateLoadedTenant'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 8
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/lifecycle/lifecycle-transitions.ts:SUCCESSORS'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 9
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:cancelTenantDeletion'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 10
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/begin-destruction.ts:beginTenantDestruction'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001
    transition_n: 11
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:forceTenantDeletingAfterRestore'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 1
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/reset/reset-tenant.ts:requestTenantReset'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 2
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/reset/tenant-reset-operations.ts:tenantResetOperations'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 3
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/services/reset/tenant-reset-workflow.ts:ensureTenantResetJobTypeRegistered
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 4
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/reset/reset-tenant.ts:requestTenantReset'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 5
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateLoadedTenant'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 6
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: inferred
    source: >-
      services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateLoadedTenant (no reset check);
      services/reset/tenant-reset-operations.ts
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 7
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: observed
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:enterTenantLoading'
  - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-003
    transition_n: 8
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    provenance: inferred
    source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateLoadedTenant (no reset check)'
permission_obligations:
  - key: hq.data-runs.manage
    where_checked: api
    scenario_examples:
      - ATS-PFM-TNL-012-01
    coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-077'
    note: 'Examples do not establish the complete key-by-key grant, revoked-grant and staff-context matrix.'
    provenance: documented
    source: >-
      rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md
evidence_note: >-
  The test-specific convention lists an Evidence body section, but the corpus checker rejects it. Sources and
  verification limits remain in frontmatter so this artifact conforms without changing the checker.
---
# Recover an incorrect initial import: Capability Test Specification

## Coverage

The category map separates defined scenarios from missing proof. A covered category has a scenario; a binding records inspected test assertions and carries no execution result. State-model completeness and untested interactions remain explicit gaps.

| Rule | Proved by |
|---|---|
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-01` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-01` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-02` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-02` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-03` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-03` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-04` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-04` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-05` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-05` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-06` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-06` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-07` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-07`, `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-11` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-08` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-08` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-09` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-09` |
| `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-012-10` | No scenario: `FND-PFM-TNL-077` |

## Interactions With Related Capabilities

Reset reapplication uses the baseline ledger. The combined scenario sets up the stated boundary, changes the upstream condition and observes its effect on the dependent outcome. Its steps and assertions are proposed; component tests do not establish this combined execution.

| Related capability | Combined coverage |
|---|---|
| `CAP-PFM-TNL-008` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-11` (proposed) |
| `CAP-PFM-TNL-017` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-012-11` (proposed) |
