--- id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017 scope: CAP-PFM-TNL-017 product_area: platform module: tenant-lifecycle revision: 3 status: proposed approved_by: null approved_at: null source_sha: services-platform: ad3f6a6582843008ed0f5a17b131878d15829af1 services-crm: a8d1364f1dd44b723bb5f9acba12f983e9ec8d69 services-commerce: c8b66a98e2490617aec38ba5c8165dd9bd0a8f9b services-committees: 36129c24daeaadcdb339218c38cdeaff9861359d services-membership: 5994c270e8a37a30f848e99ba5b5ee6b87c08893 services-submissions: 64236c19be89579ef5897aad7de3925ed3ce03bf services-websites: 5fc6823c69d5e6f208c21dba8c0eb3132f8bdc4c services-marketing: d071a159fe9782bb71ff246d5c67d5bbfe07fbfa rhythm-v2-docs: d318a948692343e2f0a7ecc2e11c50db179a8c95 scenarios: - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-01 title: Purge requests invalidation before removal level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-01 preconditions: The workspace has entered destruction. steps: Run the purge and inspect call order. expected: Cache-flush submission precedes participant deletion. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#cuts off cached access before it removes anything - TST-PFM-TNL-067 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#cuts off cached access before it removes anything category: interaction action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#cuts off cached access before it removes anything assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#cuts off cached access before it removes anything binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-02 title: Participant batches follow reverse order level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-02 preconditions: Planned participants contain more rows than their batch size. steps: Drive the purge to completion. expected: 'Participants run in reverse construction order and repeat until done, with the workspace row last.' negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#runs one step per participant, in the planned order, and completes every one of them - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#asks a participant for another batch until it answers done, rather than looping inside one invocation - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#purges accounting.transactions before accounting.configuration, which it depends on - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#removes the tenant row itself - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#removes at most one row in a batch, because that is the batch it was given provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#runs one step per participant, in the planned order, and completes every one of them category: rule action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#runs one step per participant, in the planned order, and completes every one of them assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#runs one step per participant, in the planned order, and completes every one of them binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-03 title: Purge authority rejects invalid removal level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-03 preconditions: Fixtures have non-deleting lifecycle or replaced purge ownership. steps: Call participant and stale Platform purge tasks. expected: The tested refusals retain their records. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#refuses a tenant that is not being deleted - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#removes nothing from a tenant it refused - >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/orders-participant.integration.spec.js#refuses a tenant that is not being deleted - >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/orders-participant.integration.spec.js#refuses a tenant whose deletion was cancelled part way through - >- services-membership:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/lifecycle/tenant-lifecycle.integration.spec.ts#refuses to purge a tenant Platform holds active, and removes nothing - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#refuses a purge of a tenant that is neither being deleted nor being loaded - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#refuses a purge of a tenant other than the one the session is in - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#refuses a purge that names no tenant provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#refuses a tenant that is not being deleted category: permission action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#refuses a tenant that is not being deleted assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#refuses a tenant that is not being deleted binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-04 title: Protected histories use their guarded path level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-04 preconditions: The deleting workspace has audit and history records. steps: Purge through participant functions. expected: Guarded deletion empties those records while ordinary protections remain enabled. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#empties the record history after the contacts, through the definer function - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#empties the merge tables, two of them through the definer function only they can be emptied by - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-functions.integration.spec.js#leaves the tenant no communication row at all - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-functions.integration.spec.js#leaves the tenant no security row at all - >- services-membership:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/lifecycle/tenant-lifecycle.integration.spec.ts#allows membership.purge_tenant_versions once Platform is deleting the tenant provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#empties the record history after the contacts, through the definer function category: invariant action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#empties the record history after the contacts, through the definer function assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#empties the record history after the contacts, through the definer function binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-05 title: CRM change capture distinguishes purge from ordinary edits level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-05 preconditions: Two CRM workspaces have comparable records. steps: Purge one and delete ordinarily in the other. expected: Only ordinary deletion produces its change event. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#records no change event at any point while it purges - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#records a change event for the same removal made the ordinary way in another tenant - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#runs every batch inside the hook change capture is suppressed by - TST-PFM-TNL-027 provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#records no change event at any point while it purges category: invariant action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#records no change event at any point while it purges assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#records no change event at any point while it purges binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-06 title: Prefix delimiting preserves neighboring files level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-06 preconditions: File fixtures use similar workspace names and stored versions. steps: Purge the shorter workspace prefix. expected: Its versions disappear while the similarly named neighbor remains intact. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#clears every folder of the uploads bucket the tenant’s bytes sit under - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#clears every VERSION of the tenant’s data-job objects, under all three of their prefixes - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves a folder whose name merely begins like the tenant’s, which is what the trailing slash is for - TST-PFM-TNL-067 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#clears every folder of the uploads bucket the tenant’s bytes sit under category: boundary action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#clears every folder of the uploads bucket the tenant’s bytes sit under assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#clears every folder of the uploads bucket the tenant’s bytes sit under binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-07 title: Blocked resources retain a failed decision level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-08 preconditions: A participant returns a blocked outcome. steps: Run the purge. expected: >- The request records that failure and explanation while the workspace stays deleting and staff are notified. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#fails the request with the participant’s own reason when a participant is blocked - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#leaves a tenant whose purge failed deleting, so nothing can reach it while it is half destroyed - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#tells the people a deletion that failed was not completed - TST-PFM-TNL-066 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#fails the request with the participant’s own reason when a participant is blocked category: failure action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#fails the request with the participant’s own reason when a participant is blocked assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#fails the request with the participant’s own reason when a participant is blocked binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-08 title: Verification detects returning records level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-09 preconditions: One fixture gains a late row and another has a continuing writer. steps: Complete verification attempts. expected: The first is cleared by another pass and the persistent writer yields failure with remaining counts. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#checks that nothing is left before it finalizes, and asks every participant to count - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#runs every participant again when a row appears after one of them finished, and finishes when it is gone - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#refuses to finish, with the counts, when something keeps writing to the tenant - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table a participant declares provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#checks that nothing is left before it finalizes, and asks every participant to count category: edge action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#checks that nothing is left before it finalizes, and asks every participant to count assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#checks that nothing is left before it finalizes, and asks every participant to count binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-09 title: Tested neighbors remain unchanged level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-10 preconditions: 'Platform, CRM, Committees and Marketing fixtures contain neighboring records.' steps: Purge one workspace in each fixture. expected: The tested neighboring tables retain their original rows. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows exactly as they were, table for table - >- services-committees:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/tenant-purge.integration.spec.ts#leaves the other tenant’s rows alone - >- services-marketing:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/tenant-purge.integration.spec.ts#leaves another workspace’s rows exactly as they were provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was category: boundary action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-10 title: Finalization respects customer and catalog ownership level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-11 preconditions: Deletion fixtures include final and non-final customer workspaces. steps: Finalize their requests. expected: >- Customer removal follows the explicit final-workspace choice while product catalogs and deletion-job evidence remain. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#deletes the customer with its last tenant when the request asked for it - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#keeps the customer, because the deleted tenant was not its last - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#never touches the catalog rows the product owns, whatever a customer purge removes - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#keeps the deletion’s own job rows, which are the record of what was done provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#deletes the customer with its last tenant when the request asked for it category: rule action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#deletes the customer with its last tenant when the request asked for it assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#deletes the customer with its last tenant when the request asked for it binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-11 title: Retry rejects successful and superseded attempts level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-12 preconditions: One purge failed part way and another did not fail. steps: 'Retry both, then apply a late report from the replaced attempt.' expected: >- The failed one completes retained work, the other refuses and the late report cannot change the new decision. negative: true data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#completes the destruction when a purge that failed part way is retried - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#does not run the steps a failed purge had already completed when it is retried - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#leaves a retried request untouched when the purge it replaced records its failure afterwards - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-deletion-recovery.e2e.spec.js#refuses as 409 a retry of a purge that did not fail - 'services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-deletion-recovery.e2e.spec.js#may not retry a purge' - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/lifecycle/reconciled-job-failure.integration.spec.js#fails the deletion request, which is what opens its retry route provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#completes the destruction when a purge that failed part way is retried category: edge action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#completes the destruction when a purge that failed part way is retried assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#completes the destruction when a purge that failed part way is retried binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-12 title: Deletion journey accounts for tested table removal level: api proves: - AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-004-01 preconditions: The deletion journey populates declared Platform and CRM table fixtures. steps: Run purge and inspect the declared inventories. expected: The tested workspace rows are absent from those inventories. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table a participant declares - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#empties every declared table of the tenant provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table a participant declares category: interaction action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table a participant declares assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table a participant declares binding_note: >- The original test-title references contribute separate assertions from several files. No suite receives an implements link for the complete combined scenario; a full executable mapping remains FND-PFM-TNL-084. binding_gap: FND-PFM-TNL-084 - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-13 title: Deletion journey retains its sibling workspace level: api proves: - AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-004-02 preconditions: The deletion journey includes another workspace of the same customer. steps: Purge the selected workspace. expected: The sibling fixture remains unchanged. negative: false data_needs: >- Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared. bound_to: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was - TST-PFM-TNL-067 provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was category: boundary action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-14 title: Commerce removal leaves the neighboring order workspace intact category: boundary level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-10 preconditions: >- Two isolated Commerce workspaces each hold rows throughout the declared order-domain tables; only the target is deleting. steps: Purge the target in one-row batches and compare both workspaces with owner-side counts. expected: >- Every declared target table is empty and its inventory returns zero; the neighboring workspace retains its original rows. negative: false data_needs: Use separate run-owned target and comparison workspace records created by the cited suite. bound_to: - >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#held at least one row in every declared table before the purge (premise) - >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves nothing of the tenant in any table, and the inventory counts zero everywhere - >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows untouched - TST-PFM-TNL-003 provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#held at least one row in every declared table before the purge (premise); services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves nothing of the tenant in any table, and the inventory counts zero everywhere; services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows untouched action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#held at least one row in every declared table before the purge (premise); services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves nothing of the tenant in any table, and the inventory counts zero everywhere; services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows untouched assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#held at least one row in every declared table before the purge (premise); services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves nothing of the tenant in any table, and the inventory counts zero everywhere; services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows untouched proof_scope: >- Additional direct-participant isolation example. The capability rule retains its four named application fixtures; this scenario does not establish Platform inclusion of the additional application or complete removal of undeclared resources. binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-15 title: Websites change removal is isolated from neighboring changes category: boundary level: api proves: - BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-10 preconditions: >- The target and another Websites workspace contain change and template fixtures; removal runs directly through the changes participant. steps: >- Run the target participant to completion and independently read remaining change and template rows in both workspaces. expected: >- The seeded target change and template rows are absent, its inventory is empty and the neighboring workspace is unchanged. This direct-participant check does not establish Platform plan inclusion or CMS removal. negative: false data_needs: Use separate run-owned target and comparison workspace records created by the cited suite. bound_to: - >- services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table - >- services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#answers an empty inventory once purged - >- services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows as they were - TST-PFM-TNL-114 provenance: test source: >- services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#answers an empty inventory once purged; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows as they were action_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#answers an empty inventory once purged; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows as they were assertion_evidence: provenance: test source: >- services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#answers an empty inventory once purged; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows as they were proof_scope: >- Additional direct-participant isolation example. The capability rule retains its four named application fixtures; this scenario does not establish Platform inclusion of the additional application or complete removal of undeclared resources. binding_note: >- All cited checks for this scenario occur in the registered file. The link establishes inspected executable source rather than a passing run. - id: ATS-PFM-TNL-017-16 title: A finalization fault leaves removed data outside ordinary retry category: interaction level: api proves: - INV-DOM-PFM-TNL-005-08 interacts_with: - CAP-PFM-TNL-018 - CAP-PFM-TNL-012 preconditions: >- A purge reaches workspace removal and a controlled failure occurs before request completion is persisted. steps: 'Commit workspace removal, trigger the failure, settle the purge and attempt ordinary purge retry.' expected: >- The workspace stays absent and the unfinished decision remains inspectable. Ordinary retry can refuse the missing workspace; no atomic-completion guarantee is inferred from zero inventory. negative: true data_needs: >- Create a separate run-owned workspace for each decision branch and an unaffected comparison workspace. Use a controlled clock, paused task or injected fault at the boundary named in the scenario. bound_to: [] provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-018-keep-a-lasting-record-of-a-deleted-workspace-and-stop-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md action_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-018-keep-a-lasting-record-of-a-deleted-workspace-and-stop-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md assertion_evidence: provenance: proposed source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-018-keep-a-lasting-record-of-a-deleted-workspace-and-stop-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md evidence: - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#cuts off cached access before it removes anything - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#runs one step per participant, in the planned order, and completes every one of them - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#refuses a tenant that is not being deleted - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#empties the record history after the contacts, through the definer function - >- services-crm:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/purge.integration.spec.js#records no change event at any point while it purges - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#clears every folder of the uploads bucket the tenant’s bytes sit under - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#fails the request with the participant’s own reason when a participant is blocked - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#checks that nothing is left before it finalizes, and asks every participant to count - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant of the same customer exactly as it was - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#deletes the customer with its last tenant when the request asked for it - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#completes the destruction when a purge that failed part way is retried - >- services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table a participant declares - >- services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#held at least one row in every declared table before the purge (premise); services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves nothing of the tenant in any table, and the inventory counts zero everywhere; services-commerce:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/order-domain-purge.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows untouched - >- services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves no row of the tenant in any table; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#answers an empty inventory once purged; services-websites:modules/tenant-lifecycle/tests/integration/services/participants/changes-participant.integration.spec.js#leaves the other tenant’s rows as they were - >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-018-keep-a-lasting-record-of-a-deleted-workspace-and-stop-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-012-empty-a-loading-workspace-so-it-can-be-loaded-again.md coverage: rule: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' transition: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' validation: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' permission: covered edge: covered failure: covered boundary: covered concurrency: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' invariant: covered interaction: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' coverage_notes: transition: >- The listed scenarios sample lifecycle changes. Complete transition, guard and side-effect proof is still owed for the state models named in the coverage finding. interaction: >- The added interaction is proposed. Related capabilities not included in that scenario remain named in the coverage finding. transition_obligations: - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 1 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateProvisionedTenant' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 2 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/provision-tenant-failure.ts:applyTenantProvisioningFailure - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 3 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: >- services-platform:modules/tenants/services/provisioning/submit-tenant-provisioning.ts:retryTenantProvisioning - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 4 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 5 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:enterTenantLoading' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 6 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/request-deletion.ts:requestTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 7 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:activateLoadedTenant' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 8 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/lifecycle/lifecycle-transitions.ts:SUCCESSORS' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 9 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:cancelTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 10 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/begin-destruction.ts:beginTenantDestruction' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-001 transition_n: 11 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/persistence/tenants.ts:forceTenantDeletingAfterRestore' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 1 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:holdTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 2 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/begin-destruction.ts:beginTenantDestruction' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 3 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:releaseTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 4 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:cancelTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 5 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/deletion-holds.ts:cancelTenantDeletion' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 6 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/begin-destruction.ts:beginTenantDestruction' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 7 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/tenant-purge-operations.ts:tenantPurgeOperations' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 8 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/tenant-purge-failure.ts:applyTenantPurgeFailure' - state_model: STATE-PFM-TNL-004 transition_n: 9 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' provenance: observed source: 'services-platform:modules/tenants/services/deletion/operator-recovery.ts:retryTenantPurge' permission_obligations: - key: platform.tenants.deletion-request where_checked: api scenario_examples: - ATS-PFM-TNL-017-03 coverage: 'gap: FND-PFM-TNL-082' note: 'Examples do not establish the complete key-by-key grant, revoked-grant and staff-context matrix.' provenance: documented source: >- rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md evidence_note: >- The test-specific convention lists an Evidence body section, but the corpus checker rejects it. Sources and verification limits remain in frontmatter so this artifact conforms without changing the checker. --- # Remove declared workspace resources and verify the result: Capability Test Specification ## Coverage The category map separates defined scenarios from missing proof. A covered category has a scenario; a binding records inspected test assertions and carries no execution result. State-model completeness and untested interactions remain explicit gaps. | Rule | Proved by | |---|---| | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-01` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-01` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-02` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-02` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-03` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-03` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-04` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-04` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-05` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-05` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-06` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-06` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-07` | No scenario: `FND-PFM-TNL-082` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-08` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-07` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-09` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-08` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-10` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-09`, `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-14`, `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-15` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-11` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-10` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-12` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-11` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-13` | No scenario: `FND-PFM-TNL-082` | | `BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-017-14` | No scenario: `FND-PFM-TNL-082` | ## Interactions With Related Capabilities A finalization fault leaves removed data outside ordinary retry. The combined scenario sets up the stated boundary, changes the upstream condition and observes its effect on the dependent outcome. Its steps and assertions are proposed; component tests do not establish this combined execution. | Related capability | Combined coverage | |---|---| | `CAP-PFM-TNL-018` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-16` (proposed) | | `CAP-PFM-TNL-015` | Gap: `FND-PFM-TNL-082` | | `CAP-PFM-TNL-012` | `ATS-PFM-TNL-017-16` (proposed) |