Products Testing Back-Fill
Coverage Added
Nineteen capability test specifications move into Design without changing their identifiers. Their ten-category maps distinguish scenario coverage, justified exclusions and findings, while structured ledgers name required rules, object invariants, state transitions, permission keys and related-capability interactions.
| Measure | Count |
|---|---|
| Specifications moved and extended | 19 |
| Capability scenarios added | 36 |
| Feature suites written | 4 |
| Feature scenarios written | 20 |
| Executable suites registered | 66 |
| Scenario-to-suite bindings made | 210 |
| Coverage-gap findings added | 20 |
| Inconsistency findings added | 1 |
| Category cells with a gap | 80 |
| Capability scenarios without execution bindings | 40 |
| Feature scenarios without execution bindings | 12 |
| Added Scenario Category | Count |
|---|---|
| rule | 1 |
| transition | 7 |
| validation | 0 |
| permission | 1 |
| edge | 3 |
| failure | 0 |
| boundary | 3 |
| concurrency | 1 |
| invariant | 1 |
| interaction | 19 |
Evidence Limits
The register includes local enforcing API suites, database integration suites, deterministic and carried compatibility suites, development journeys and mocked browser checks. Binding details retain the exact existing assertions; a category marked covered means a scenario is specified, while suite conformance and execution remain unverified. The domain browser journey skips its database work, and older development walks retain expectations that differ from the current editor.
The remaining execution work covers concurrency across product, setup and bundle writes, remote-template recovery, domain extension rollback, Commerce realization, export delivery and precise boundary and permission variants. Feature chains without a complete existing execution stay proposed. These are recorded coverage obligations, rather than unfinished artifact registration.
Validation
The dependency installation and corpus conformance command passes with zero errors. The repository checker tests pass. Service and browser suites are examined as source evidence and remain unrun.
Verdict
The testing back-fill establishes the capability, feature and executable hierarchy for the complete module while preserving existing identities and authority values. The pinned tests provide useful configuration and lifecycle evidence, but concurrency, remote recovery, downstream completion and several boundaries still need executable proof. Andrew can review the proposed coverage and its explicit gaps without mistaking test registration for product approval or a passing qualification run.