CRM → Entities Testing Back-fill Examination
Continuation (pass 2)
This pass reviews all nineteen capability test specifications, seven feature acceptance suites and 773 executable registrations against the pinned source evidence. It rewrites the detailed-test coverage and source explanations and all feature-suite explanations, then restores the three deferred feature bindings with reciprocal executable references. Existing scenario identifiers, rule references and source pins remain permanent; source inspection does not advance product approval.
The member-creation and changed-classification journeys supply their feature assertions. The unchanged-save suite contributes contact history and conflict checks plus organization version and timestamp checks. It does not assert organization history absence or stale organization refusal; those parts remain an explicit finding and are listed as unbound assertions.
The current default branch is merged without rewriting history. Its checker recognizes the required back-fill report and feature-scenario references, so those deferred items are complete. The checker still rejects the exact evidence heading required by the authoring contract; the detailed tests retain their frontmatter evidence and carry a source-evidence explanation, with the contract conflict recorded for a separate tooling change.
Coverage and Bindings
| Item | Final count |
|---|---|
| Capability specifications | 19 |
| Capability scenarios | 320 |
| Feature acceptance suites | 7 |
| Feature scenarios | 35 |
| Executable registrations | 773 |
| Capability bindings | 337 |
| Feature bindings | 3 |
| Categories recorded as gaps | 41 |
| Unbound capability scenarios | 141 |
| Executable registrations without scenario mappings | 629 |
The first pass adds 138 capability scenarios: two rule, eight transition, twenty permission, four edge, six failure, two boundary, three concurrency, three invariant and ninety interaction cases. This continuation adds no scenario or suite identifier; it completes the deferred bindings and adds two finding identifiers.
Remaining Findings
The category gaps remain recorded in the detailed specifications and their existing findings. The required shared-detail warning has a finding rather than a scenario, and unmapped executable files remain inventory rather than counted proof. The existing archive-history disagreement and unbound concurrent hierarchy interaction retain their findings.
Two continuation findings record the evidence-heading conflict and the incomplete organization no-op assertions. Resolving them requires a tooling change or executable assertions in a source repository, outside this documentation job. Every item left by the previous checkpoint is now completed or has a finding; no unexamined continuation item remains.
Validation
Dependency installation and the corpus check pass with zero errors, and all seven repository tests pass. The structural audit finds reciprocal bindings, existing registered files and literal anchors for the 669 binding references it examines; the one required rule without a scenario has its recorded finding. Existing corpus warnings remain, and product suites are not executed, so executable results remain unrecorded and conformance remains unverified.
Verdict
Andrew can review the completed testing continuation with every deferred item either restored or recorded as a finding. The corpus passes its required checks, while the remaining specification gaps and incomplete executable proof remain explicit. This examination supplies final OpenAI text and source traceability, but it supplies neither product approval nor delivery qualification.