Regions and the Policy Carry No Custom Fields
Context
Older regional definitions carried custom values. The recorded custom-field architecture choice excludes that regional extension.
Decision
The regional registration does not declare custom-field capability, and regional request validation accepts the definition’s own fields. The recorded regional customization gap is closed rather than awaiting implementation.
Alternatives Considered
Carry older regional custom values into the new definition. The recorded opt-in decision limits CRM custom fields to contacts and organizations, and geographic matching has no use for those regional values.
Consequences
Metadata exposes the regional definition’s declared fields without a custom-field contract. A carry-through comment in the console refers to historical custom-field support and does not establish current capability.