Integrations Testing Examination Continuation
Continuation (pass 2)
The starting corpus contains a previous testing examination report, although the continuation brief describes that report as absent. That report lists the report filename as its sole remaining authoring requirement. The current checker accepts the required name, so the continuation resolves that requirement without changing checker code.
The examination covers all capability test specifications, feature acceptance suites and executable registrations. The previous testing changes were already authored by OpenAI; this pass retains their verified scenario and suite text, rewrites the testing explanations and adds an explicit contribution limit to every bound capability scenario. The module index follows the report rename, and the design examination gains a continuation section without changing any other design artifact.
Evidence and Proof Boundaries
All registered test files exist at the pinned commits, and every retained individual test-case title is present in its cited source. The register has no duplicate file registrations, and all scenario-to-suite links are reciprocal. The source inventory identifies no additional executable suite requiring registration: the unregistered acceptance shells match the existing finding and contain no direct expectation assertions.
Each capability has all ten coverage categories and a category on every scenario. The proposed case matrices account for all modeled transitions, and each declared related-capability link has an interaction scenario. These checks establish traceability and designed coverage; they do not establish that a suite executes every matrix branch or that the behavior passes at runtime.
Of the required rules, eighteen lack designed scenarios and are explicitly listed in findings. Fifty-six object invariants have no direct scenario reference, and their obligations remain listed in the independent invariant findings. Missing permission cases, unbound capability outcomes and whole-feature compositions remain visible in the existing coverage evidence.
Corrections and Disposition
The continuation closes the obsolete report-name blocker and records a newly discovered identifier collision. Four finding identifiers have both control-gap and testing-gap allocations in the starting corpus. Their references and meanings remain in the historical evidence; the new finding asks Andrew to decide their representation, and the registry advances future allocation beyond every existing identifier.
No rule, concept, journey, technical design contract, approval status or product-intent value changes. No scenario, suite or binding is invented to fill a reported gap. The retained executable registrations still report that they have not run and that conformance has not been verified.
Verification
The required corpus acceptance commands and the source audits are recorded in frontmatter. Runtime integration, browser, provider and deployed-environment suites do not run in this documentation examination, so their result fields remain unchanged. Existing corpus warnings and the historical identifier collision remain visible limitations despite a conforming corpus.
Verdict for Andrew
The continuation completes the previous report’s authoring requirement and leaves a traceable testing corpus with every remaining proof obligation recorded. The weakest evidence is complete executable acceptance across feature compositions, uncovered rules and invariants, and unavailable or conditional browser steps. Before qualification, resolve the historical finding-identifier collision and open product decisions, then implement and execute the missing proof.