Partial: Accounting Batch Management Testing Back-Fill

Twenty capability specifications move to design with their identifiers preserved and receive ten-category coverage maps. Ninety-nine capability scenarios are added: seventy-eight interactions, four rule checks, four validations, three permissions, two failures, five boundaries, two concurrency checks and one invariant check. Five feature suites contain twenty-five scenarios, and the register records one hundred thirty-five executable suites.

There are 267 scenario-to-suite links across 142 capability scenarios. Twenty-one coverage-gap findings and one inconsistency finding preserve the remaining proof and conformance limits. Suite registration carries no fresh execution result; every source suite remains unrun and its conformance remains unverified.

Work Remaining

The requested report name and the inspected fiscal feature binding require the small checker correction recorded in the structured remaining-work list. That correction lies outside the authorized edit scope, so the checkpoint uses a recognized examination filename and keeps the feature binding proposed. After authorization, apply the correction, restore the reciprocal binding, move the report to its requested name and rerun both acceptance commands before committing.

Verdict

The checkpoint establishes the capability, feature and executable testing layers with sourced links and explicit proof gaps. It remains partial because one complete feature binding and the requested report filename depend on an out-of-scope checker correction. Product approval and accounting qualification remain separate from this documentation back-fill.