12 scenarios proving CAP-COM-CAT-016; 12 bound to an existing test.
01 Alternative pricing matches the decision’s examplesunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-01 BR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-02 AS-JNY-COM-CAT-005-01 02 Bounded combination search handles extra promotionsunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-03 03 Sequential line benefits precede order benefitsunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-04 04 Exclusive codes compete against automatic benefitsunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-05 05 Comparison bases and ties preserve audience pricingunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-06 06 Discount arithmetic preserves rounded allocationsunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-08 BR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-09 07 Item exclusions and shipping caps remain distinctunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-10 08 Refusal order returns private-information-safe messagesunitnegativetestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-11 BR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-13 09 Ineffective codes produce no applied benefitunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-12 AS-JNY-COM-CAT-005-02 10 Alternative explanations identify why a code loses or winsunittestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-14 11 Selling-area timeout distinguishes preview from placementunitnegativetestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-15 12 Concurrent usage respects finite capacityapinegativetestBR-CAP-COM-CAT-016-16