Use a consistent console frame: Capability Test Specification
Coverage
The coverage map describes specified proof, not a passing run. Each mandatory rule below has a scenario or an explicit finding; a proposed scenario remains an execution obligation even when its expected outcome follows the pinned implementation.
Startup retry must be exercised through every failure outcome, cancellation and session ending. Workspace remount and cleanup belong to the switching interactions, not to an assumed universal cache-erasure guarantee.
Interactions With Related Capabilities
The frame and menu wait together; after the answer, CRM destinations appear under the established workspace.
The interaction rows cite the contracts they exercise. Related combinations without a complete case remain in the coverage finding, together with cross-capability workflows and permission boundaries. A helper assertion is bound only for its stated outcome; the full browser handoff remains proposed until a suite checks it.
Pinned source and exact test anchors are recorded in frontmatter. Test bindings record static assertion review and use the executable-suite register; no product test result is inferred from that review. The prior planning and design examinations supply context, while this continuation records the remaining proof obligations explicitly.