Each scenario names the guarantee it proves. Category coverage describes specified cases; executable bindings retain their narrower assertion boundaries. Lifecycle coverage remains a gap wherever guards and effects lack independent verification.
Use localized recipients, a declared destination link and supported console and e-mail channels. Process the occurrence, inspect retained data and deliveries, then open its destination from the recipient inbox.
The interaction case combines the producing, processing and reading outcomes named in its frontmatter. It remains proposed until an executable suite performs that complete sequence.
Coverage
Rulecovered
Transitionnot-applicable
Validationgap: FND-PFM-NOT-065
Permissionnot-applicable
Edgegap: FND-PFM-NOT-065
Failuregap: FND-PFM-NOT-065
Boundarycovered
Concurrencygap: FND-PFM-NOT-065
Invariantcovered
Interactioncovered
Test Scenarios
5 scenarios proving CAP-PFM-NOT-004; 4 bound to an existing test.
01Apply locale fallback and time-zone formattingruleunittest
Prepare a definition opening My Responsibilities; a request in a workspace and one in no workspace.
Steps
Generate both destination forms and follow the console action.
Expected
Console content retains the workspace-relative route; configured external channels receive an absolute link; the HQ route survives. Opening reaches My Responsibilities in the notice workspace.