Each scenario names the guarantee it proves. Category coverage describes specified cases; executable bindings retain their narrower assertion boundaries. Lifecycle coverage remains a gap wherever guards and effects lack independent verification.
Use a request with a primary recipient and one eligible copy. Send the message, report a permanent bounce for the copy and delivery for the primary recipient, then submit another request to each address.
The interaction case combines the producing, processing and reading outcomes named in its frontmatter. It remains proposed until an executable suite performs that complete sequence.
Coverage
Rulegap: FND-PFM-NOT-080
Transitiongap: FND-PFM-NOT-080
Validationcovered
Permissioncovered
Edgecovered
Failuregap: FND-PFM-NOT-080
Boundarycovered
Concurrencycovered
Invariantcovered
Interactioncovered
Test Scenarios
9 scenarios proving CAP-PFM-NOT-019; 8 bound to an existing test.
01Correlate and deduplicate provider reportsinvariantapitest
Retrieve changes as one service in pages of two; change a message a second time; read as a service that sent nothing; exceed the page ceiling.
Expected
Only matching service names return in ascending change order with a resume cursor. A later change reappears, unmatched results are empty and invalid cursors fail.