The category map distinguishes authored scenarios from unresolved proof obligations. A bound scenario names an existing executable suite; its recorded result remains unrun.
Hide and reverse a commercial withhold. The customer sees no internal decision and completed narrowing and widening flows request invalidation.
Review a withdrawn exception in staff history. The same decision remains explainable with its original reason and revocation attribution.
Restore contract coverage after withdrawing a withhold. The commercial source of the restored result is the surviving contract.
Relate a change to its security history. The successful flow has attributable history; the later failure leaves the committed decision visible for investigation.
Observe an access change across cache refresh. The refresh request refers to the changed scope; access reflects the current decision after refresh or expiry.
Pinned assertion sources support the listed executable bindings. Proposed cases retain the proof required beyond those boundaries. Structured obligations name incomplete object, transition and permission trace; row-level concurrency proof does not establish complete workflow serialization.
Coverage
Rulecovered
Transitioncovered
Validationcovered
Permissioncovered
Edgecovered
Failurecovered
Boundarycovered
Concurrencygap: FND-PFM-OPS-063
Invariantcovered
Interactioncovered
Test Scenarios
17 scenarios proving CAP-PFM-OPS-011; 11 bound to an existing test.
01Validate a reasoned decisionvalidationapinegativetest