Rhythm 2.0 Specifications

Appearance

ATS-PFM-TNL-016Revalidate the irreversible deletion decision: Capability Test Specification

Markdown

ATS-PFM-TNL-016

Revalidate the irreversible deletion decision: Capability Test Specification

Markdown
  • DocumentProposed

Planning

Proves capability
CAP-PFM-TNL-016

Design

Executed by
TST-PFM-TNL-051, TST-PFM-TNL-061

KindAcceptance test setProduct areaPlatformModuleWorkspace Lifecycle Across ApplicationsRevision3

Read atservices-platform ad3f6a65services-crm a8d1364fservices-commerce c8b66a98services-committees 36129c24services-membership 5994c270services-submissions 64236c19services-websites 5fc6823cservices-marketing d071a159rhythm-v2-docs d318a948

Revalidate the irreversible deletion decision: Capability Test Specification ​

Coverage ​

The category map separates defined scenarios from missing proof. A covered category has a scenario; a binding records inspected test assertions and carries no execution result. State-model completeness and untested interactions remain explicit gaps.

RuleProved by
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-01ATS-PFM-TNL-016-01
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-02ATS-PFM-TNL-016-02
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-03ATS-PFM-TNL-016-03
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-04ATS-PFM-TNL-016-04
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-05ATS-PFM-TNL-016-05, ATS-PFM-TNL-016-09
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-06ATS-PFM-TNL-016-06
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-07ATS-PFM-TNL-016-07

The winning destruction decision closes preservation routes. The combined scenario sets up the stated boundary, changes the upstream condition and observes its effect on the dependent outcome. Its steps and assertions are proposed; component tests do not establish this combined execution.

Related capabilityCombined coverage
CAP-PFM-TNL-014ATS-PFM-TNL-016-09 (proposed)
CAP-PFM-TNL-017ATS-PFM-TNL-016-09 (proposed)

Coverage

  • Rule gap: FND-PFM-TNL-081
  • Transition gap: FND-PFM-TNL-081
  • Validation covered
  • Permission covered
  • Edge covered
  • Failure covered
  • Boundary covered
  • Concurrency covered
  • Invariant gap: FND-PFM-TNL-081
  • Interaction covered

Test Scenarios

9 scenarios proving CAP-PFM-TNL-016; 7 bound to an existing test.

01 HTTP catalog exposes no destruction shortcutboundaryapiproposed
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-01
Preconditions
The complete deletion route registry and a scheduled request are available.
Steps
Inspect operations and drive the schedule through eligibility.
Expected
No execute-now or force action appears; the schedule invokes destruction after its guards.
Data
Create isolated workspace and caller fixtures matching the scenario; supply controlled failure or timing inputs only where required.
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/aws/api/tenant-deletion-requests.routes.ts
02 Revalidation waits for changing obstaclesvalidationapinegativetest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-02
Preconditions
Eligibility and workspace conditions vary one at a time.
Steps
Attempt destruction before and at the date and with held, unnotified, child-bearing or locked fixtures.
Expected
The valid boundary begins destruction while the obstructed fixtures wait.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#waits one millisecond before the date
03 Lost requester authority produces a holdpermissionapinegativetest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-03
Preconditions
The requester no longer has deletion permission.
Steps
Attempt destruction at eligibility.
Expected
The request is held with its authority explanation and no purge begins.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#holds the request in that case, so a person has to look at it rather than a job retrying forever
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#waits when the person who asked no longer holds the permission to ask
04 Terminal schedules end without side effectsedgeapitest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-04
Preconditions
Fixtures are cancelled, superseded, missing or have lost their workspace.
Steps
Ask the schedule to begin destruction.
Expected
Each returns an explained end without mutating the request or workspace.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#ends when another execution now owns the request, which is what a resume looks like
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-deletion-schedule.integration.spec.js#ends quietly, without destroying anything, when the request was cancelled while it slept
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#ends when the request was cancelled while the job slept
05 Irreversible state and purge job commit togethertransitionapitest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-05
Preconditions
All destruction guards hold.
Steps
Begin destruction and inspect persisted records.
Expected
Executing state, time, deleting disabled lifecycle, notice and purge job agree.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#names the purge job it submitted in the same transaction, so the point of no return and its destruction commit together
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#answers that destruction began
06 Concurrent cancel has one winnerconcurrencyapitest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-06
Preconditions
Twenty eligible requests support separate connections.
Steps
Race cancellation and destruction on each.
Expected
One decision wins per round and request and workspace states match it.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#races both ways across the rounds, so the suite is not quietly proving one order every time
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#lets exactly one of the two win, every round
07 Watcher recovery preserves the decisionfailureapitest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-07
Preconditions
A request’s watcher has stopped.
Steps
Resume it and immediately attempt another resume.
Expected
The new watcher references its predecessor and unchanged date; the live replacement refuses another resume.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-deletion-recovery.e2e.spec.js#answers a new schedule job, and names the one it superseded
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-deletion-recovery.e2e.spec.js#leaves the request scheduled, and its eligibility exactly where it was: a resume cannot bring a deletion forward
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-deletion-recovery.e2e.spec.js#refuses a second resume as 409 while the new schedule job is alive
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenant-deletion-recovery.e2e.spec.js#answers a new schedule job, and names the one it superseded
08 Deletion journey respects the preservation boundaryinteractionapitest
Proves
AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-004-03
Preconditions
The deletion journey includes eligible race fixtures.
Steps
Cancel before and after the destruction transition.
Expected
The winning pre-destruction cancellation preserves data and the late cancellation refuses.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/begin-destruction.integration.spec.js#lets exactly one of the two win, every round
09 The winning destruction decision closes preservation routesinteractionapinegativeproposed
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-016-05
Preconditions
An eligible request and authorized cancellation attempt contend at the destruction boundary.
Steps
Run cancellation and irreversible handoff concurrently; inspect request, workspace and purge-job records and try a later cancellation.
Expected
One decision wins with matching records. A destruction winner submits purge and subsequent cancellation refuses; a cancellation winner submits no purge.
Data
Create a separate run-owned workspace for each decision branch and an unaffected comparison workspace. Use a controlled clock, paused task or injected fault at the boundary named in the scenario.
Source
rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-016-begin-destruction-only-when-every-safeguard-still-holds.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-005-keep-people-and-background-work-out-of-a-workspace-that-is.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-013-ask-for-a-workspace-to-be-deleted-after-a-waiting-period.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-014-hold-release-or-call-off-a-deletion-before-destruction.md

The Markdown files under specs/ in rhythmsoftware/rhythm-v2-docs are the canonical source of truth. This reader is a generated, read-only projection of them.

Rhythm Software