Rhythm 2.0 Specifications

Appearance

ATS-PFM-TNL-018Retain deletion evidence and prevent identifier reuse: Capability Test Specification

Markdown

ATS-PFM-TNL-018

Retain deletion evidence and prevent identifier reuse: Capability Test Specification

Markdown
  • DocumentProposed

Planning

Proves capability
CAP-PFM-TNL-018

Design

Executed by
TST-PFM-TNL-057, TST-PFM-TNL-066, TST-PFM-TNL-067

KindAcceptance test setProduct areaPlatformModuleWorkspace Lifecycle Across ApplicationsRevision3

Read atservices-platform ad3f6a65services-crm a8d1364fservices-commerce c8b66a98services-committees 36129c24services-membership 5994c270services-submissions 64236c19services-websites 5fc6823cservices-marketing d071a159rhythm-v2-docs d318a948

Retain deletion evidence and prevent identifier reuse: Capability Test Specification ​

Coverage ​

The category map separates defined scenarios from missing proof. A covered category has a scenario; a binding records inspected test assertions and carries no execution result. State-model completeness and untested interactions remain explicit gaps.

RuleProved by
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-01ATS-PFM-TNL-018-01
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-02ATS-PFM-TNL-018-02
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-03ATS-PFM-TNL-018-03
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-04ATS-PFM-TNL-018-04
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-06No scenario: FND-PFM-TNL-083
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-07ATS-PFM-TNL-018-07
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-08ATS-PFM-TNL-018-05

Restore reapplication has an access window. The combined scenario sets up the stated boundary, changes the upstream condition and observes its effect on the dependent outcome. Its steps and assertions are proposed; component tests do not establish this combined execution.

Related capabilityCombined coverage
CAP-PFM-TNL-001ATS-PFM-TNL-018-07 (proposed)
CAP-PFM-TNL-005ATS-PFM-TNL-018-07 (proposed)

Coverage

  • Rule gap: FND-PFM-TNL-083
  • Transition gap: FND-PFM-TNL-083
  • Validation covered
  • Permission gap: FND-PFM-TNL-083
  • Edge covered
  • Failure gap: FND-PFM-TNL-083
  • Boundary gap: FND-PFM-TNL-083
  • Concurrency gap: FND-PFM-TNL-083
  • Invariant covered
  • Interaction covered

Test Scenarios

7 scenarios proving CAP-PFM-TNL-018; 6 bound to an existing test.

01 Completion retains numeric evidenceruleapitest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-01
Preconditions
The purge fixture has completed.
Steps
Read its deletion request.
Expected
Removal totals and zero-result verification remain available.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#records on the request what was removed, and the counts it verified
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#records on the request what was removed, and the counts it verified
02 Request identity survives workspace removalinvariantapitest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-02
Preconditions
Deletion removed the workspace record.
Steps
Read the retained request.
Expected
Its copied identity, actors and dates remain readable.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/request-deletion.integration.spec.js#copies the tenant name and customer, so the record still reads after the tenant is gone
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#keeps the deletion’s own job rows, which are the record of what was done
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/request-deletion.integration.spec.js#copies the tenant name and customer, so the record still reads after the tenant is gone
03 External ledger retains completed deletioninvariantapitest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-03
Preconditions
The purge fixture completed its outside-database work.
Steps
Read the workspace’s ledger entry.
Expected
The completed dates and count evidence appear in its retained entry.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#writes the permanent deletion record outside the database, keyed by the tenant
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#writes the permanent deletion record outside the database, keyed by the tenant
04 Retired identity cannot be provisioned againvalidationapinegativetest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-04
Preconditions
A completed deletion ledger entry exists.
Steps
Request creation under the same identifier.
Expected
The refusal identifies retirement and its deletion request.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge-recovery.integration.spec.js#refuses to create a tenant again under the id of one that was deleted
05 Legacy immediate delete changes nothingedgeapinegativetest
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-08
Preconditions
Fixtures include present and absent workspaces.
Steps
Invoke immediate deletion for both.
Expected
The same refusal directs callers to requests and preserves the present workspace.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#answers the gone status the error contract can express
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#points the caller at the deletion request route
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#leaves the tenant exactly as it was, which is the point of refusing
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#answers the same to a tenant that does not exist, because nothing is read before the refusal
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/e2e/tenants.e2e.spec.js#answers the gone status the error contract can express
06 Deletion journey retains evidence and retirementinteractionapitest
Proves
AS-JNY-PFM-TNL-004-04
Preconditions
The deletion journey completed its fixture.
Steps
Read retained counts and attempt identifier reuse.
Expected
Numeric history remains and creation refuses the retired identifier.
Data
Use the run-owned records and caller contexts created by the cited tests; use their provider and clock seams only where declared.
Bound to
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#records on the request what was removed, and the counts it verified
Source
services-platform:modules/tenants/tests/integration/services/deletion/tenant-purge.integration.spec.js#records on the request what was removed, and the counts it verified
07 Restore reapplication has an access windowinteractionapinegativeproposed
Proves
BR-CAP-PFM-TNL-018-07
Preconditions
A backup restores an active workspace whose completed deletion exists only in the external ledger.
Steps
Check ordinary access before reapplication, run reapplication in dry-run and apply modes, and check lifecycle and access again.
Expected
The product should refuse ordinary access before reapplication as well as after apply; dry-run should leave records unchanged and apply should record disabled deleting standing. The current gate admits a restored active fixture before apply, so the initial assertion is an unresolved defect.
Data
Create a separate run-owned workspace for each decision branch and an unaffected comparison workspace. Use a controlled clock, paused task or injected fault at the boundary named in the scenario.
Source
rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-018-keep-a-lasting-record-of-a-deleted-workspace-and-stop-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-005-keep-people-and-background-work-out-of-a-workspace-that-is.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-001-ask-for-a-new-workspace-and-have-every-application-build-it.md; rhythm-v2-docs:specs/platform/tenant-lifecycle/planning/capabilities/CAP-PFM-TNL-017-remove-everything-a-workspace-owned-and-prove-it-is-gone.md

The Markdown files under specs/ in rhythmsoftware/rhythm-v2-docs are the canonical source of truth. This reader is a generated, read-only projection of them.

Rhythm Software