Accounting Reconciliation Design Examination

Scope and Method

The examination checked the complete design against the pinned service and console, then rewrote its narrative and structured explanatory text in OpenAI wording. The reconciliation module row and section of Accounting Responsibilities received the same treatment. Identifiers, ownership references, decision origins, intent and implementation-evidence values remain unchanged except for the verification changes recorded in the metadata.

Each invariant, transition, workflow hop and operation was compared with its cited declaration or implementation. Database claims were checked against migrations as well as table declarations; source-symbol existence alone was not treated as proof of enforcement. Screen review followed routes, components, loading, adapters and command dispatch rather than assuming that an available service operation is displayed.

The plan’s explicit approval entry supports the existing decision origins even though its final answer table is blank. Approved decisions were cited rather than decided again. Planning artifacts were left unchanged, and implementation disagreements remain findings rather than new product approvals.

Counts and Coverage

Coverage	Examined	Result
Design artifacts	49	Five domain objects, five state models, eleven workflows, one service contract, seven screen contracts and twenty decision records.
HTTP operations	45 of 45	Every reconciliation route operation has a service-contract entry with access, permission and publication metadata.
In-process functions	7 of 7 contracted functions	Transaction recording, readiness and posting-source functions are represented in the service contract and responsibility inventory. This count excludes private implementation helpers.
Physical tables	18 of 18	Every reconciliation table is represented by a domain object, including shared supporting evidence, activity and request-key records. Readiness is computed and owns no table.
Screen routes	7 of 7	The seven route surfaces have contracts; payout entry and exception detail controls are covered within their parent surfaces.
Invariant rows	44	Enforcement location and provenance were checked; service-only and database protections are distinguished.
Transition rows	47	Five local models describe stored and derived state; immediate balance and return-to-draft transitions were added.
Workflow hops	57	All eleven workflows were checked against their sources, commit boundaries and failure behavior.
Display rows	26	Browser-derived displays and omitted service fields are identified.
Owned durable state machines	0	Local lifecycles are service and database logic. Batch posting and Close execution belong to adjacent modules.
Owned queues	0	Daily work uses shared Accounting schedule dispatch; its three work kinds and attention repair have workflow coverage. Shared queue retries are documented dependencies, not independently verified module guarantees.
Inference calls and operations	0	No examined module call invokes a model task. All nineteen service, workflow and screen artifacts carry empty inference lists.
New findings	7	Two high, four medium and one low; existing product questions remain open.

Changes by Artifact

Every row below received a complete final-text pass. The change column records verification corrections or states that the evidence already supported the design. Evidence values changed during verification are listed individually in the metadata, including prior and replacement values.

Artifact	Verification result and change
ADR-ACC-REC-001	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-002	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-003	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-004	Qualified universal lock and expected-version statements.
ADR-ACC-REC-005	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-006	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-007	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-008	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-009	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-010	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-011	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-012	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-013	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-014	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-015	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-016	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-017	Verified the cited origin, implemented choice and alternatives; no evidence correction was needed.
ADR-ACC-REC-018	Limited audited refusal claims to the explicit guard paths.
ADR-ACC-REC-019	Recorded dollar-cent display and the empty accounting plan’s exponent-check exception.
ADR-ACC-REC-020	Recorded unversioned dismissals and the limits of browser command sequences.
DOM-ACC-REC-001	Corrected historical holdings cardinality and the evidence-attachment version exception.
DOM-ACC-REC-002	Made processor optional; separated service-protected eligibility dates from database-protected identity and references.
DOM-ACC-REC-003	Recorded finalization counter repair and the dismissal version exception.
DOM-ACC-REC-004	Distinguished database deduplication from service suppression of accepted concerns; qualified attention and supplemental command versions.
DOM-ACC-REC-005	Removed the unsupported promise that a caller transaction freezes all assessed records.
SCR-ACC-REC-001	Described shared read requirements, browser-computed summaries and the calendar-month period label.
SCR-ACC-REC-002	Described shared read requirements and dollar-cent input and display.
SCR-ACC-REC-003	Corrected source-batch and history sources, completed reversal omissions, partial saving and shared read requirements.
SCR-ACC-REC-004	Described shared read requirements and the limits of loaded reconciliation details.
SCR-ACC-REC-005	Described shared read requirements and the outstanding-list action baseline.
SCR-ACC-REC-006	Described shared read requirements and the actual note, acceptance and investigation controls.
SCR-ACC-REC-007	Replaced server-directed navigation with local linking and exposed missing clearing, currency and availability fields.
STATE-ACC-REC-001	Limited lock and version claims to commands that actually use those mechanisms.
STATE-ACC-REC-002	Included the accounting-date reset when verified bank evidence becomes a mismatch.
STATE-ACC-REC-003	Made the claim requirement explicit, added immediate balance and return-to-draft edges, and corrected reversal dating.
STATE-ACC-REC-004	Added split-command evidence for the resolution transition.
STATE-ACC-REC-005	Recorded unversioned withdrawal and restoration of the underlying investigating state.
SVC-ACC-REC-reconciliation	Corrected two read permissions; aligned internal functions, integration semantics, default-batch ownership and failure limits.
WF-ACC-REC-001	Verified caller-owned settlement recording and transaction rollback; no evidence correction was needed.
WF-ACC-REC-002	Replaced global serialization with maximum-plus-one allocation, uniqueness and five savepoint attempts.
WF-ACC-REC-003	Recorded unversioned dismissal and stale browser planning after a failed reload.
WF-ACC-REC-004	Replaced an event seam with later in-process posting-source reads.
WF-ACC-REC-005	Separated the open-day helper from the operational batch date used for mirror requests.
WF-ACC-REC-006	Removed an unsupported reconciliation event-publication seam.
WF-ACC-REC-007	Qualified append-only storage and described synchronous source loading by the posting engine.
WF-ACC-REC-008	Separated purge transactions and qualified repeat detection, dispatch and unavailable queue implementation.
WF-ACC-REC-009	Distinguished audience registration from delivery; retained the disabled switch and sweep overlap limits.
WF-ACC-REC-010	Removed the expected-version claim for acceptance withdrawal.
WF-ACC-REC-011	Qualified close-time concurrency, selected-batch dating, the current-day preview and local console navigation.

Responsibility and Registry Changes

The reconciliation responsibility inventory retains its five owned objects and fifty-two service entries. Attention items, local activity and scheduled occurrences now match the service contract’s event inventory, and default operational batch selection is delegated to Batch Management. Its prose points to invariant homes and describes the important implementation limits without restating their rules.

Seven finding identifiers were reserved before use. The existing numbering finding was corrected to describe collision retries rather than universal serialization, and the findings table remains continuous. The module’s catalog status now records design examination; individual artifact approval states were not promoted.

Open Disagreements

Finding	Unresolved issue	Required follow-through
FND-ACC-REC-037	Currency is discarded and all console money uses dollar cents.	Decide supported currencies and make input, display and adapters agree with account currency.
FND-ACC-REC-038	Close-time readiness does not freeze every assessed financial or investigation record.	Establish the required close consistency boundary and identify the commands that must join it.
FND-ACC-REC-039	Readiness navigation, clearing fields, currency and payment availability are lost or mismatched in the console.	Align the response and adapter before relying on the screen for controller review.
FND-ACC-REC-040	Supplemental commands lack the version protection described by the draft.	Decide which commands require version checks and how partially saved drafts recover.
FND-ACC-REC-041	Counter repair and service-only eligibility-date protection differ from the architectural account.	Reconcile the approved planning language with the required enforcement and repair policy.
FND-ACC-REC-042	Source-batch and activity views are browser constructions, with completed reversal details omitted.	Decide the history and correction evidence the workspace must show.
FND-ACC-REC-043	Platform compliance and disabled-attention schedule bootstrap cannot be established from the supplied source.	Inspect the shared implementation and standards before claiming production detection and delivery guarantees.

Earlier findings still govern bank verification, late-posting review, duplicate acknowledgement, approval contributors, attention enablement and partial draft saving. The five existing product questions were not answered by this examination. The approved planning rules remain their current homes; resolving implementation disagreement requires an explicit product or implementation decision.

Validation and Commit Discipline

Dependency installation, corpus conformance and the corpus test suite passed: zero conformance errors and four passing tests. Literal path and anchor review found no missing checked reference. These checks validate the corpus and its references; they do not establish runtime recovery of unavailable shared services.

Verification corrections were committed before final-text rewrites, and each design artifact has its own rewrite commit. The additional derived-state coverage was also followed by a separate final-text commit. Work stayed on the task branch in a worktree; no source implementation, reader, planning artifact or publication workflow was changed, and no push or deployment was performed.

Verdict for Andrew

The examined design is a faithful, qualified account of the module at the pinned commits, with implementation disagreements retained as findings rather than converted into approvals. Its weakest areas are controller-facing evidence in the console and the consistency and production scheduling guarantees around period close. Before implementation preparation starts, decide the currency scope, close consistency boundary, required investigation and correction evidence, and the resolution of the existing bank-verification, late-review, attention and draft-saving gaps.