The coverage map describes specified proof, not a passing run. Each mandatory rule below has a scenario or an explicit finding; a proposed scenario remains an execution obligation even when its expected outcome follows the pinned implementation.
Refresh coverage needs the exact five-minute endpoint, hidden tabs, failures, shared requests, narrow replacement, HQ no-op and superseded successful timestamps. A second workspace can share the previous workspace’s pending read; that race remains unexecuted.
The refreshed sidebar removes CRM and retains Membership without a page reload.
The interaction rows cite the contracts they exercise. Related combinations without a complete case remain in the coverage finding, together with cross-capability workflows and permission boundaries. A helper assertion is bound only for its stated outcome; the full browser handoff remains proposed until a suite checks it.
Pinned source and exact test anchors are recorded in frontmatter. Test bindings record static assertion review and use the executable-suite register; no product test result is inferred from that review. The prior planning and design examinations supply context, while this continuation records the remaining proof obligations explicitly.
Coverage
Rulegap: FND-PFM-CSH-066
Transitiongap: FND-PFM-CSH-066
Validationcovered
Permissiongap: FND-PFM-CSH-066
Edgegap: FND-PFM-CSH-066
Failurecovered
Boundarycovered
Concurrencygap: FND-PFM-CSH-066
Invariantgap: FND-PFM-CSH-066
Interactioncovered
Test Scenarios
9 scenarios proving CAP-PFM-CSH-016; 3 bound to an existing test.