Understand the workspace’s application availability: Capability Test Specification
Coverage
The coverage map describes specified proof, not a passing run. Each mandatory rule below has a scenario or an explicit finding; a proposed scenario remains an execution obligation even when its expected outcome follows the pinned implementation.
Overview coverage needs view authority, first-load progress, retry, empty results, malformed availability, destination-link eligibility, cached-data error suppression and disabled-workspace reads. Customer redaction is tested separately from organization-level availability wording.
Interactions With Related Capabilities
The available row offers navigation and the destination refuses missing task authority; the unavailable row offers no configuration link.
The interaction rows cite the contracts they exercise. Related combinations without a complete case remain in the coverage finding, together with cross-capability workflows and permission boundaries. A helper assertion is bound only for its stated outcome; the full browser handoff remains proposed until a suite checks it.
Pinned source and exact test anchors are recorded in frontmatter. Test bindings record static assertion review and use the executable-suite register; no product test result is inferred from that review. The prior planning and design examinations supply context, while this continuation records the remaining proof obligations explicitly.