The category map distinguishes authored scenarios from unresolved proof obligations. A bound scenario names an existing executable suite; its recorded result remains unrun.
Show the same standing with audience-specific detail. The views agree on unavailability while the customer view omits internal decisions and attribution.
Read standing within the administrator’s reach. The local explanation is available without exposing the other customer’s standing.
Keep application availability separate from personal authority. The standing read does not itself grant the person permission to use a protected action.
Pinned assertion sources support the listed executable bindings. Proposed cases retain the proof required beyond those boundaries. Structured obligations name incomplete object, transition and permission trace; row-level concurrency proof does not establish complete workflow serialization.
Coverage
Rulegap: FND-PFM-OPS-068
Transitionnot-applicable
Validationgap: FND-PFM-OPS-068
Permissioncovered
Edgegap: FND-PFM-OPS-068
Failuregap: FND-PFM-OPS-068
Boundarycovered
Concurrencygap: FND-PFM-OPS-068
Invariantcovered
Interactioncovered
Test Scenarios
6 scenarios proving CAP-PFM-OPS-016; 3 bound to an existing test.
01Present the administrator’s application standingpermissionapitest